Past, present and future of primary systemic treatment in breast cancer

被引:0
作者
José L Alonso-Romero [1 ]
Antonio Piero-Madrona [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oncology and Surgery,"Virgen de la Arrixaca" University Hospital,30120 Murcia,Spain
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast carcinoma; Primary systemic therapy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R737.9 [乳腺肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Primary systemic treatment is a fundamental part of breast cancer therapy, and it is applied to non-surgical and locally advanced tumours as well as surgical tumours to increase the likelihood of conservative treatment. Its aim is to achieve the best possible survival with better cosmetic results and with the lowest number of treatment-related secondary effects. Before treatment is started, it is necessary to attain the best knowledge of the biological features and locoregional extension of the tumour. To do so, it is necessary to obtain a biopsy of the lesion with a wide bore needle,as well as good radiological knowledge of the disease.Therefore, currently, the use of a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) of the breast should be included in all cases. In addition, before it is started,especially in those tumours in which conservative treatment is considered, one or several radiopaque markers should be put into place to make it possible to locate the area to be treated if there is a considerable or complete response. Systemic treatment is mainly based on combined chemotherapy with anthracyclins and taxanes, in addition to some biological agents with demonstrated efficiency for increasing the likelihood of complete disease response(trastuzumab in patients with Her-2/neu overexpression). However, there is room for neoadjuvant hormone treatment, in patients with hormone receptor overexpression, especially in those cases in which chemotherapy is contraindicated as well as in elderly patients with a relatively short life expectancy. The assessment of preoperative treatment should be based on adequate radiological tests, and nowad these should include MRI before taking decisions about adequate surgical treatment. The objective of primary treatment is to be able to increase survival and improve the chances of local treatment in the case of locally advanced treatment, achieving results that are at least equal to those of adjuvant treatment in the case of surgical tumours, but with greater chances of conservative surgery. Although the objective is survival, achieving complete pathological response seems to be a reasonable related objective, although these are more closely linked in some tumour subtypes.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 33
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Macaskill, Petra
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Marinovich, Michael L.
    Mamounas, Eleftherios
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (18) : 3342 - 3354
  • [2] Pathologic Complete Response Predicts Recurrence-Free Survival More Effectively by Cancer Subset: Results From the I-SPY 1 TRIAL—CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657[J] . Laura J. Esserman,Donald A. Berry,Angela DeMichele,Lisa Carey,Sarah E. Davis,Meredith Buxton,Cliff Hudis,Joe W. Gray,Charles Perou,Christina Yau,Chad Livasy,Helen Krontiras,Leslie Montgomery,Debasish Tripathy,Constance Lehman,Minetta C. Liu,Olufunmilayo I. Olopade,Hope S. Rugo,John T. Carpenter,Lynn Dressler,David Chhieng,Baljit Sin
  • [3] Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial[J] . José Baselga,Ian Bradbury,Holger Eidtmann,Serena Di Cosimo,Evandro de Azambuja,Claudia Aura,Henry Gómez,Phuong Dinh,Karine Fauria,Veerle Van Dooren,Gursel Aktan,Aron Goldhirsch,Tsai-Wang Chang,Zsolt Horváth,Maria Coccia-Portugal,Julien Domont,Ling-Min Tseng,Georg Kunz,Joo Hyuk Sohn,Vladimir Semiglazov,Guillermo Lerzo,Marketa Palacova,Volodymyr Probachai,Lajos Pus
  • [4] Trastuzumab combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J] . Antonis Valachis,Davide Mauri,Nikolaos P. Polyzos,Grigoris Chlouverakis,Dimitrios Mavroudis,Vassilios Georgoulias.The Breast . 2011 (6)
  • [5] Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients
    Kong, Xiangnan
    Moran, Meena S.
    Zhang, Ning
    Haffty, Bruce
    Yang, Qifeng
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 (14) : 2084 - 2090
  • [6] Differential Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to a Docetaxel and Carboplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Treatment
    Chang, Helena R.
    Glaspy, John
    Allison, Mary Ann
    Kass, Frederic C.
    Elashoff, Robert
    Chung, Debra U.
    Gornbein, Jeffrey
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (18) : 4227 - 4237
  • [7] Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study[J] . Breast Cancer Research and Treatment . 2010 (1)
  • [8] Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J] . RohitBhargava,SushilBeriwal,David J.Dabbs,UmutOzbek,AtillaSoran,Ronald R.Johnson,Adam M.Brufsky,Barry C.Lembersky,Gretchen M.Ahrendt.Cancer . 2010 (6)
  • [9] Common and discriminative clinicopathological features between breast cancers with pathological complete response or progressive disease in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Osako, Tomo
    Horii, Rie
    Matsuura, Masaaki
    Ogiya, Akiko
    Domoto, Kaoru
    Miyagi, Yumi
    Takahashi, Shunji
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Iwase, Takuji
    Akiyama, Futoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 136 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [10] Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review[J] . Carolien H.M. van Deurzen,Birgit E.P.J. Vriens,Vivianne C.G. Tjan-Heijnen,Elsken van der Wall,Mirjam Albregts,Richard van Hilligersberg,Evelyn M. Monninkhof,Paul J. van Diest.European Journal of Cancer . 2009 (18)