3-D geochemical interpolation guided by geophysical inversion models

被引:0
作者
Tom Horrocks [1 ]
Eun-Jung Holden [1 ]
Daniel Wedge [1 ]
Chris Wijns [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Exploration Targeting.School of Earth Sciences, University of Western Australia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P624 [地质勘探];
学科分类号
0818 ; 081801 ;
摘要
3-D geochemical subsurface models, as constructed by spatial interpolation of drill-core assays, are valuable assets across multiple stages of the mineral industry’s workflow.However, the accuracy of such models is limited by the spatial sparsity of the underlying drill-core, which samples only a small fraction of the subsurface.This limitation can be alleviated by integrating collocated 3-D models into the interpolation process, such as the 3-D rock property models produced by modern geophysical inversion procedures, provided that they are sufficiently resolved and correlated with the interpolation target.While standard machine learning algorithms are capable of predicting the target property given these data, incorporating spatial autocorrelation and anisotropy in these models is often not possible.We propose a Gaussian process regression model for 3-D geochemical interpolation, where custom kernels are introduced to integrate collocated 3-D rock property models while addressing the trade-off between the spatial proximity of drill-cores and the similarities in their collocated rock properties, as well as the relative degree to which each supporting 3-D model contributes to interpolation.The proposed model was evaluated for 3-D modelling of Mg content in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit based on drill-core analyses and four 3-D geophysical inversion models.Incorporating the inversion models improved the regression model’s likelihood(relative to a purely spatial Gaussian process regression model) when evaluated at held-out test holes, but only for moderate spatial scales(100 m).
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 151
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] 3D reflection seismic imaging for open-pit mine planning and deep exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland[J] . Alireza Malehmir,Christopher Juhlin,Chris Wijns,Milovan Urosevic,Petri Valasti,Emilia Koivisto.Geophysics . 2012 (5)
  • [22] Comparison of linear regression and a probabilistic neural network to predict porosity from 3‐D seismic attributes in Lower Brushy Canyon channeled sandstones, southeast New Mexico[J] . Daniel J. Leiphart,Bruce S. Hart.Geophysics . 2001 (5)
  • [23] 3-D inversion of gravity data
    Li, YG
    Oldenburg, DW
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 63 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [24] Seismic‐guided estimation of log properties (Part 1: A data‐driven interpretation methodology)[J] . Philip S. Schultz,Shuki Ronen,Masami Hattori,Chip Corbett.The Leading Edge . 1994 (5)
  • [25] Use of multiattribute transforms to predict log properties from seismic data[J] . Daniel P. Hampson,James S. Schuelke,John A. Quirein.Geophysics . 2012 (1)
  • [26] Seismic‐guided estimation of log properties (Part 3: A controlled study)[J] . Philip S. Schultz,Shuki Ronen,Masami Hattori,Pascal Mantran,Chip Corbett.The Leading Edge . 2012 (7)
  • [27] Seismic‐guided estimation of log properties (Part 2: Using artificial neural networks for nonlinear attribute calibration)[J] . Shuki Ronen,Philip S. Schultz,Masami Hattori,Chip Corbett.The Leading Edge . 2012 (6)
  • [28] Application of machine learning methods to spatial interpolation of environmental variables
    Li, Jin
    Heap, Andrew D.
    Potter, Anna
    Daniell, James J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (12) : 1647 - 1659
  • [29] Integrated interpretation of geology and geophysics, using inversions, to predict geology under cover[J] . Williams.ASEG Extended Abstracts . 2010 (1)
  • [30] A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors[J] . Jin Li,Andrew D. Heap.Ecological Informatics . 2010 (3)