Robust public-private partnerships for joint railway and property development

被引:0
作者
Ka Fai NG [1 ]
Hong K.LO [1 ]
Yue HUAI [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
关键词
public-private partnership; BFOOD; housing and railway development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F283 [基本建设投资与经济效益];
学科分类号
0201 ;
摘要
The involvement of the private sector in the construction or operation of an infrastructure project may enhance the financial viability of projects, which facilitates the formation of public-private partnership(PPP) for project delivery. PPP exploits the strength of the private sector by shifting certain project risks from the public party to the private sector who can efficiently manage certain risks. In joint railway and housing development, the approach of bundling railway and housing development(R&HD) allows cross-subsidization between immense railway construction cost and profitable housing rental revenue. This approach also provides flexibility in incorporating PPP models by distributing railway and housing revenues and costs and their inherent risks properly to the public and private sectors. Ng and Lo(2015a) developed an evaluation framework for joint railway and property development, which evaluates PPPs based on financial and construction criteria for selecting the best suitable PPP for a particular project. This study,which is based on the framework in Ng and Lo(2015a),aims to examine the robustness of various PPP configurations. This study analyzes the effects of PPP configurations on stakeholders’ risks and returns under population or demand growth and railway construction cost uncertainties. The eventual outcome of particular PPP configurations is also examined. This study also seeks to answer the following questions: How would optimal configuration change under highly volatile population and railway construction cost? Are there PPP configurations that are robust to these uncertainties and those that are sensitive to a particular uncertainty? This understanding is critical for managing risks and facilitating the formation of appropriate PPP for R&HD.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 450
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The formation of public-private partnerships in China: an institutional perspective [J].
Zhang, Yanlong .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 35 (02) :329-354
[42]   Public-Private Partnerships in Slovenia: Recent Developments and Perspectives [J].
Ticar, Bojan ;
Zajc, Katarina .
REVIEW OF CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN LAW, 2010, 35 (02) :191-215
[43]   Public-private partnerships: determinants of the type of governance structure [J].
Fleta-Asin, Jorge ;
Munoz, Fernando ;
Rosell-Martinez, Jorge .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 22 (10) :1489-1514
[44]   Stochastic simulated rents in Portuguese public-private partnerships [J].
Matos, Jose M. A. ;
Ramos, Sandra ;
Costa, Vitor .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 130 :107-117
[45]   A typology of cybersecurity and public-private partnerships in the context of the EU [J].
Raphael Bossong ;
Ben Wagner .
Crime, Law and Social Change, 2017, 67 :265-288
[46]   Public-Private Partnerships and the Specifics of Their Implementation in Vocational Education [J].
Vertakova, Julia ;
Plotnikov, Vladimir .
21ST INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC CONFERENCE OF SIBIU 2014, IECS 2014 PROSPECTS OF ECONOMIC RECOVERY IN A VOLATILE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT: MAJOR OBSTACLES, INITIATIVES AND PROJECTS, 2014, 16 :24-33
[47]   Adaptive Leadership in Public-Private Partnerships for Security Enhancement [J].
Singh, Satpreet .
SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT AND WIRELESS NETWORKS, SAM 2024, ICWN 2024, 2025, 2254 :313-326
[48]   Public-private partnerships as a policy response to climate change [J].
Buso, Marco ;
Stenger, Anne .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 :487-+
[49]   EU and International Organisations Rules on Public-Private Partnerships [J].
Kranjc, Vesna .
LEX LOCALIS-JOURNAL OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT, 2009, 7 (02) :197-207
[50]   Public-Private Investment Partnerships: Efficiency Estimation Methods [J].
Trynov, A. V. .
EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2016, 12 (02) :602-612