Robust public-private partnerships for joint railway and property development

被引:0
|
作者
Ka Fai NG [1 ]
Hong K.LO [1 ]
Yue HUAI [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
关键词
public-private partnership; BFOOD; housing and railway development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F283 [基本建设投资与经济效益];
学科分类号
0201 ;
摘要
The involvement of the private sector in the construction or operation of an infrastructure project may enhance the financial viability of projects, which facilitates the formation of public-private partnership(PPP) for project delivery. PPP exploits the strength of the private sector by shifting certain project risks from the public party to the private sector who can efficiently manage certain risks. In joint railway and housing development, the approach of bundling railway and housing development(R&HD) allows cross-subsidization between immense railway construction cost and profitable housing rental revenue. This approach also provides flexibility in incorporating PPP models by distributing railway and housing revenues and costs and their inherent risks properly to the public and private sectors. Ng and Lo(2015a) developed an evaluation framework for joint railway and property development, which evaluates PPPs based on financial and construction criteria for selecting the best suitable PPP for a particular project. This study,which is based on the framework in Ng and Lo(2015a),aims to examine the robustness of various PPP configurations. This study analyzes the effects of PPP configurations on stakeholders’ risks and returns under population or demand growth and railway construction cost uncertainties. The eventual outcome of particular PPP configurations is also examined. This study also seeks to answer the following questions: How would optimal configuration change under highly volatile population and railway construction cost? Are there PPP configurations that are robust to these uncertainties and those that are sensitive to a particular uncertainty? This understanding is critical for managing risks and facilitating the formation of appropriate PPP for R&HD.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 450
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    Havanova, Natalia Vladimirovna
    TURISMO-ESTUDOS E PRATICAS, 2021,
  • [2] PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    Tireuov, Kanat
    Mizanbekova, Salima
    Aitkhozhayeva, Gulsim
    Mizanbekov, Ilyas
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2023, 11 (01): : 98 - 112
  • [3] THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    Caballero, Francisco Velasco
    REVISTA CATALANA DE DRET PUBLIC, 2023, (67): : 36 - 66
  • [4] Public-private partnerships: an overview
    Widdus, R
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2005, 99 : S1 - S8
  • [5] Development of Public-Private Partnerships in the Transportation Sector in The World
    Bulbul, Duran
    Akgungor, Zehra
    SOSYOEKONOMI, 2024, 32 (59) : 343 - 362
  • [6] PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AND DIALOGICAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
    Galvao, Ciro Di Benatti
    De Oliveira Junior, Paulo Afonso
    LEX HUMANA, 2014, 6 (01) : 29 - 43
  • [7] Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Development: Stakeholder Views in Slovenia
    Fikfak, Alenka
    Bugaric, Bojan
    Niksic, Matej
    Mujkic, Sabina
    Konjar, Miha
    Grom, Janez Peter
    Koritnik, Bostjan
    Blaganje, Mitja
    Pirnat, Rajko
    Plicanic, Senko
    EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW, 2019, 25 (03): : 325 - 345
  • [8] INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN UKRAINE
    Lozynska, Tamara
    Birchenko, Nataliia
    Piskun, Alona
    Dengub, Valentyna
    ECONOMICS ECOLOGY SOCIUM, 2024, 8 (04): : 53 - 65
  • [9] RISK ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
    Rodriguez, Alexander
    Berezin, Andrey
    Gorodnova, Natalia
    10TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2016, : 1566 - 1575
  • [10] Public-Private Partnerships and Value for Money
    Silva, Robson de Faria
    Souza, Alceu
    Kaczam, Fabiola
    Dalazen, Luciano Luiz
    da Silva, Wesley Vieira
    da Veiga, Claudimar Pereira
    PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2022, 27 (04) : 347 - 370