Modeling the Contemporary Stress Field and Deformation Pattern of Eastern Mediterranean

被引:0
作者
S K Dwivedi
D Hayashi
机构
[1] SimulationTectonicsLaboratory,FacultyofScience,UniversityoftheRyukyus
关键词
finite element model; maximum horizontal stress; seismicity; crustal deformation; Anatolia; eastern Mediterranean;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P553 [地壳应力与活动构造];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The contemporary stress field in the earth's crust is important and provides insights into mechanisms that drive plate motions.In this study,elastic plane stress finite element modeling incorporating realistic rock parameters was used to calculate the stress field,displacement field,and deformation of the plate interactions in the eastern Mediterranean.Modeled stress data for the African-Arabian-Anatolian plate interactions with fixed European platform correlate well with observed contemporary stress indicator from the world stress map(WSM) and focal mechanism of earthquakes;while displacement field agrees qualitatively well with GPS vectors and sense of motion indicated by focal mechanisms for large crustal earthquakes(Ms>6) and plate motion models.Modeling result shows the direction of maximum horizontal compressive stress(σHmax) toward the direction of absolute motion of these plates.Large perturbations in σHmax orientations are shown to occur in and around tectonic boundaries between those plates.It is observed that,although the African plate acts mostly as indenter,which transmits the collisional motion from the Arabian plate to the Anatolian plate,in the current situation,the far-field stress,probably from the subduction in Aegean Arc,is needed to satisfy the contemporary stress field in Anatolia.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 381
页数:17
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Numerical modeling of the development of southeastern Red Sea continental margin[J]. Sunil Kumar Dwivedi,Daigoro Hayashi.Earthquake Science. 2009(03)
[2]  
Comment on “Structural analysis of mylonitic rocks in the Cougar Creek Complex, Oregon–Idaho using the porphyroclast hyperbolic distribution method, and potential use of SC′-type extensional shear bands as quantitative vorticity indicators”[J] . Yadong Zheng,Tao Wang,Jinjiang Zhang.Journal of Structural Geology . 2009 (5)
[3]  
Oblique lineations in orthogneisses and supracrustal rocks: vertical partitioning of strain in a hot crust (eastern Borborema Province, NE Brazil)[J] . Sérgio Pacheco Neves,José Maurício Rangel da Silva,Gorki Mariano.Journal of Structural Geology . 2005 (8)
[4]  
The influence of different rheological parameters on the surface deformation and stress field of the Aegean–Anatolian region[J] . Kasper D. Fischer.International Journal of Earth Sciences . 2006 (2)
[5]   GPS constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia plate motions [J].
McClusky, S ;
Reilinger, R ;
Mahmoud, S ;
Ben Sari, D ;
Tealeb, A .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 155 (01) :126-138
[6]  
Numerical modelling of the Aegean–Anatolian region: geodynamical constraints from observed rheological heterogeneities[J] . S.Cianetti,P.Gasperini,C.Giunchi,E.Boschi.Geophysical Journal International . 2001 (3)
[7]  
Stress and deformation patterns in the Aegean region[J] . Theodor Doutsos,Sotiris Kokkalas.Journal of Structural Geology . 2001 (2)
[8]  
Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis[J] . Erdin Bozkurt.Geodinamica Acta . 2001 (1-3)
[9]  
Regional Significance of Neotectonic Counterclockwise Rotation in Central Turkey[J] . O. Tatar,J. Piper,H. Gursoy,H. Temiz.International Geology Review . 1996 (8)
[10]  
The Kazova basin: an active negative flower structure on the Almus Fault Zone, a splay fault system of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey[J] . Tectonophysics . 1996 (3)