Mission-Oriented Mega-R&D Programs:Governance and Policy

被引:1
作者
Yutao Sun [1 ]
Cong Cao [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology
[2] Business School, University of Nottingham Ningbo China
基金
欧盟第七框架计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G322 [中国];
学科分类号
1201 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Using the concepts of technology goal(T), effective organization(O), and market end-user(M), this paper proposes a TOM framework for analyzing the contextual characteristics of adoption of the MMRD model as a tool of R&D governance. Applying the framework to cases across multiple historical periods, sectors, and countries, we find that R&D with a clear and specific technology goal, dominance of R&D by government agencies, and public sectors as end-users create an appropriate scenario for a government to adopt the MMRD model, while in doing so the government should also take into consideration such factors as economic efficiency, national security, and public interests. We evaluate the TOM framework based on its application to China’s practice, particularly its ongoing mega-engineering programs(MEPs). Only a few MEPs under its national development plan are likely to be successful while others will likely not achieve their original aims.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 134
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Governing varieties of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new typology
    Wittmann, Florian
    Hufnagl, Miriam
    Lindner, Ralf
    Roth, Florian
    Edler, Jakob
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (05) : 727 - 738
  • [2] The leading role of support organisations in cluster networks of developing countries
    Galaso, Pablo
    Miranda, Adrian Rodriguez
    [J]. INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2021, 28 (07) : 902 - 931
  • [3] The promises and premises of mission-oriented innovation policy-A reflection and ways forward
    Janssen, Matthijs J.
    Torrens, Jonas
    Wesseling, Joeri H.
    Wanzenbock, Iris
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (03) : 438 - 444
  • [4] Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective[J] . Stephen L. Vargo,Melissa Archpru Akaka,Heiko Wieland.Journal of Business Research . 2020 (prep)
  • [5] Assembling mega-urban projects through state-guided governance innovation: the development of Lingang in Shanghai[J] . Jie Shen,Xiang Luo,Fulong Wu.Regional Studies . 2020
  • [6] Returning scientists and the emergence of China's science system
    Cao, Cong
    Baas, Jeroen
    Wagner, Caroline S.
    Jonkers, Koen
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 47 (02) : 172 - 183
  • [7] COVID-19 needs a Manhattan Project
    Berkley, Seth
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 367 (6485) : 1407 - 1407
  • [8] Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views[J] . Franz T?dtling,Michaela Trippl.European Planning Studies . 2018 (9)
  • [9] Institutional complementarities: The origins of experimentation in China’s plug-in electric vehicle industry[J] . John P. Helveston,Yanmin Wang,Valerie J. Karplus,Erica R.H. Fuchs.Research Policy . 2018
  • [10] Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets[J] . Ashraful Alam,Moshfique Uddin,Hassan Yazdifar.Technological Forecasting & Social Change . 2018