Anti-pancreatic antibody in Turkish patients with inflammatory bowel disease and first-degree relatives

被引:1
作者
Huseyin Demirsoy [1 ]
Kamil Ozdil [1 ]
Ozdal Ersoy [1 ]
Besir Kesici [1 ]
Cetin Karaca [1 ]
Canan Alkim [1 ]
Nihat Akbayir [1 ]
Levent Kamil Erdem [1 ]
Mehmet Derya Onuk [1 ]
Hulya Tugrul Beyzadeoglu [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology,Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital,34377 Istanbul,Turkey
[2] Hulya Tugrul Beyzadeoglu,Institute of Hygiene,34020 Istanbul,Turkey
关键词
Anti-pancreatic antibody; Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody; Crohn’s disease; Ulcerative colitis; Inflammatory bowel disease;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R574 [肠疾病];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIM: To identify the role of anti-pancreatic antibody (PAB) in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) among Turkish patients, and its frequency in firstdegree relatives.METHODS: PAB and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA) were examined in serum samples of 214 subjects including patients with Crohn’s disease (CD, n = 64), ulcerative colitis (UC, n = 63), first-degree relatives of patients with CD (n = 25), first-degree relatives of patients with UC (n = 28),and a control group with gastrointestinal symptoms other than (IBD) (n = 34) by indirect immunofluorescence Positivity of PAB and ASCA was compared in terms of Vienna classification, disease activity and medications used.RESULTS: In terms of PAB positivity, no difference was found between patients with CD (14.1%) and UC (7.9%) however, significant difference was observed between patients with CD and subjects in the control group (P < 0.05). No difference was found between patients with CD and their relatives in terms of ASCA positivity, whereas a significant difference was found between other groups (P < 0.001). Compared to ASCA, the sensitivity of the PAB was 19% (7/37), its specificity was 93% (25/27), positive predictive value was 77% (7/9) and negative predictive value was 45% (25/55). ASCA was found with significantly higher prevalence in patients with CD activity index > 150 (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: PAB is valuable in the diagnosis of IBD rather than CD, but cannot be used alone for diagnostic purposes. PAB is not superior to ASCA in CD diagnosis and in detecting CD among relatives of patients with CD.
引用
收藏
页码:5732 / 5738
页数:7
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Pancreatic autoantibodies in Greek patients with inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Koutroubakis, IE ;
Drygiannakis, D ;
Karmiris, K ;
Drygiannakis, I ;
Makreas, S ;
Kouroumalis, EA .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2005, 50 (12) :2330-2334
[2]   Serological differentiation of inflammatory bowel diseases [J].
Conrad, K ;
Schmechta, H ;
Klafki, A ;
Lobeck, G ;
Uhlig, HH ;
Gerdi, S ;
Henker, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :129-135
[3]   Impaired pancreatic function in patients with Crohn's disease with and without pancreatic autoantibodies [J].
Seibold, F ;
Scheurlen, M ;
Muller, A ;
Jenss, H ;
Weber, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 22 (03) :202-206
[4]  
Prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease among Relatives of Patients with Crohn’s Disease[J] . U. Mons&eacute,n,O. Bernell,C. Johansson,G. Hellers.Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 1991 (3)
[5]  
Should family mem-bers of IBD patients be screened for CARD15/NOD2muta-tions?. Vermeire S,Van Assche G,Rutgeerts P. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases . 2008