Postpartum intrauterine device contraception: A review

被引:0
作者
Shadi Rezai [1 ]
Pameela Bisram [2 ]
Hasan Nezam [3 ]
Ray Mercado [1 ]
Cassandra E Henderson [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
[2] St.George’s University School of Medicine
[3] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toledo Medical Center
关键词
Access to intrauterine devices; Contra ception; Expulsion; Intrauterine device; Long acting reversible contraception; Postpartum contraception; Postpartum intrauterine device; Postpartum intrauterine device placement; Post-placental insertion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R169.41 [避孕方法];
学科分类号
100404 ;
摘要
AIM: To review the safety(infection, perforation) andefficacy(expulsion, continuation rates, pregnancy) of intrauterine device(IUD) insertion in the postpartum period. METHODS: MEDLINE, Pub Med and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies of IUD insertions at different times during the postpartum period. Time of insertion during the postpartum period was documented specifically, immediate post placenta period(within 10 min), early post placenta period(10 min to 72 h), and delayed/interval period(greater than 6 wk). Other study variables included mode of delivery, vaginal vs cesarean, manual vs use of ring forceps to insert the IUD. RESULTS: IUD insertion in the immediate postpartum(within 10 min of placental delivery), early postpartum(10 min up to 72 h) and Interval/Delayed(6 wk onward) were found to be safe and efficacious. Expulsion rates were found to be highest in the immediate postpartum groups ranging from 14% to 27%. Immediate post placental insertion found to have expulsion rates that ranged from 3.6% to 16.2%. Expulsion rate was significantly higher after insertion following vaginal vs cesarean delivery. The rates of infection, perforation and unplanned pregnancy following postpartum IUD insertion are low. Method of insertion such as with ring forceps, by hand, or another placement method unique to the type of IUD did not show any significant difference in expulsion rates. Uterine perforations are highest in the delayed/interval IUD insertion groups.Breastfeeding duration and infant development are not affected by delayed/interval insertion of the nonhormonal(copper) IUD or the Levonorgestrel IUD. Timing of the Levonorgestrel IUD insertion may affect breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: IUD insertion is safe and efficacious during the immediate postpartum, early postpartum and delayed postpartum periods. Expulsion rates are highest after vaginal delivery and when inserted during the immediate postpartum period. IUD associated infection rates were not increased by insertion during the postpartum period over interval insertion rates.There is no evidence that breastfeeding is negatively affected by postpartum insertion of copper or hormonesecreting IUD. Although perforation rates were higher when inserted after lactation was initiated. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further elucidate the consequence of lactation on postpartum insertion. Despite the concerns regarding expulsion, perforation and breastfeeding, current evidence indicates that a favorable risk benefit ratio in support of postpartum IUD insertion. This may be particularly relevant for women for whom barriers exist in achieving desired pregnancy spacing.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 139
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Sarita Sonalkar,Nathalie Kapp.Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: A systematic review[J].The European Journal of Contraception and Reprodu,2015(1)
[2]  
Amy K. Whitaker,Loraine K. Endres,Stephanie Q. Mistretta,Melissa L. Gilliam.Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial[J].Contraception,2014
[3]   Postplacental or delayed levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding duration [J].
Chen, Beatrice A. ;
Reeves, Matthew F. ;
Creinin, Mitchell D. ;
Schwarz, E. Bimla .
CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (05) :499-504
[4]  
Joshua D. Dahlke,Eric R. Terpstra,Abigail M. Ramseyer,Jeanne M. Busch,Thomas Rieg,Everett F. Magann.Postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel–intrauterine system at three time periods: a prospective randomized pilot study[J].Contraception,2011(3)
[5]  
S.R. Goodman,C. Benedict,M.F. Reeves,M. Pera-Floyd,M. Dela Cruz,A. Foster-Rosales.Minimizing barriers to IUD use: the impact of post-abortal IUD, simplified screening criteria and staff re-introduction[J].Contraception,2006(2)
[6]  
Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up[J].Contraception,2006(5)
[7]   Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women [J].
Ogburn, JA ;
Espey, E ;
Stonehocker, J .
CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (06) :426-429
[8]  
Ayman H. Shaamash,Gamal H. Sayed,Mostafa M. Hussien,Mamdouh M. Shaaban.A comparative study of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena? versus the Copper T380A intrauterine device during lactation: breast-feeding performance, infant growth and infant development[J].Contraception,2005(5)
[9]  
Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study[J].Contraception,2005(3)
[10]   Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices [J].
Çelen, S ;
Möröy, P ;
Sucak, A ;
Aktulay, A ;
Danisman, N .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (04) :279-282