A computerized resolution visual acuity test in preschool and school age children

被引:0
作者
Ying-Yan Qin [1 ]
Zhen-Zhen Liu [1 ]
Li-Yuan Zhu [1 ]
Xuan Bao [1 ]
Fu-Rong Luo [1 ]
Yi-Zhi Liu [1 ]
Young Tsau [2 ]
Ming-Xing Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
[2] Dimetek Digital Medical Technologies,Limited
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
visual acuity test; computerized; children; sensitivity; amblyopia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R777.44 [];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
● AIM: To develop a novel approach called the Autoacuity Tester, and to evaluate its validity, especially the sensitivity and specificity for detecting amblyopia.● METHODS: Children aged from 3 to 12 y(n=552) were enrolled in the study. The validity of the Autoacuity Tester was evaluated by comparing it to the Tumbling E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(ETDRS) acuity chart for school age children, and Lea Symbols and Teller acuity card(TAC) for preschool children. The repeatability was assessed by coefficient of repeatability(COR). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting amblyopia were calculated.● RESULTS: The mean difference(95% limits of agreement) between the Autoacuity Tester and the ETDRS tests were-0.03(-0.24, 0.19) logMAR for the school age group. In preschool children, the mean difference was 0.04(-0.14, 0.21) logMAR between the Autoacuity Tester and the TAC and 0.00(-0.17, 0.18) logMAR between the Autoacuity Tester and the Lea Symbols. For the school age group, the COR was 0.20 logMAR for the Autoacuity Tester and 0.18 logMAR for the ETDRS. For the preschool group, the COR was 0.13 logMAR for the Autoacuity Tester and 0.21 logMAR for TAC. The Autoacuity Tester(88%) is more sensitive than TAC(72%) in detecting amblyopia(P=0.04), while had similar specificity(92% vs 90%, P=0.20).● CONCLUSION: The Autoacuity Tester provides a reliable alternative for assessing visual acuity, and offers advantage of higher testability and repeatability for preschool children.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Pediatric Vision Screening [J].
Loh, Allison R. ;
Chiang, Michael F. .
PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2018, 39 (05) :225-234
[2]  
Automated Measurement of Visual Acuity in Pediatric Ophthalmic Patients Using Principles of Game Design and Tablet Computers[J] . Tariq M. Aslam,Humza J. Tahir,Neil R.A. Parry,Ian J. Murray,Kun Kwak,Richard Heyes,Mahani M. Salleh,Gabriela Czanner,Jane Ashworth.American Journal of Ophthalmology . 2016
[3]  
Instrument-based pediatric vision screening[J] . Mary A. O’Hara.Current Opinion in Ophthalmology . 2016
[4]  
Infant visual attention and object recognition[J] . Greg D. Reynolds.Behavioural Brain Research . 2015
[5]   A new computer-based pediatric vision-screening test [J].
Yamada, Tomohiko ;
Hatt, Sarah R. ;
Leske, David A. ;
Moke, Pamela S. ;
Parrucci, Nick L. ;
Reese, J. Jeffrey ;
Ruben, James B. ;
Holmes, Jonathan M. .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2015, 19 (02) :157-162
[6]   Validity of a layperson-administered Web-based vision screening test [J].
Longmuir, Susannah Q. ;
Pfeifer, Wanda ;
Shah, Shaival S. ;
Olson, Richard .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2015, 19 (01) :29-32
[7]  
Preschool vision screening: update on guidelines and techniques[J] . Cynthia L. Alley.Current Opinion in Ophthalmology . 2013 (5)
[8]  
Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic[J] . Ian L. Bailey,Jan E. Lovie-Kitchin.Vision Research . 2013
[9]  
A study of pre-school vision screening tests' testability, validity and duration: do group differences matter?[J] . Josephine Shallo-Hoffmann,Rachel Coulter,Pamela Oliver,Patrick Hardigan,Cyril Blavo.Strabismus . 2004 (2)
[10]   Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the vision in preschoolers study [J].
Schmidt, P ;
Ciner, E ;
Cyert, L ;
Dobson, V ;
Kulp, MT ;
Maguire, M ;
Moore, B ;
Orel-Bixler, D ;
Peskin, E ;
Quinn, G ;
Redford, M ;
Schultz, J ;
Beck, R ;
Cotter, S ;
Holmes, J ;
Shipp, M ;
West, S ;
Schmidt, P ;
Maguire, M ;
Dobson, V ;
Quinn, G ;
Ciner, E ;
Cyert, L ;
Kulp, MT ;
Moore, B ;
Orel-Bixler, D ;
Redford, M ;
Ying, GS ;
Orel-Bixler, D ;
Qualley, P ;
Howard, D ;
Fisher, S ;
Fong, D ;
Hsiao, C ;
Koseoglu, S ;
Moy, AM ;
Shapiro, S ;
Verdon, L ;
Watson, T ;
Frane, S ;
Friedman, N ;
Seino, J ;
McDonnell, S ;
Paez, E ;
Perea, C ;
Sloan, D ;
Smith, E ;
Soto, L ;
Stelly-Leonard, A ;
Moore, B .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (04) :637-650