Detailed seismic risk analysis of electrical substation equipment using a reliability based approach

被引:0
作者
Amir Ghahremani Baghmisheh [1 ]
Milad Khodaei [2 ]
Ali Zare Feiz Abadi [3 ]
Homayoon E.Estekanchi [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz
[3] Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM63 [变电所]; P315.9 [工程地震];
学科分类号
070801 ; 080802 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a risk analysis framework for substation structures based on reliability methods. Even though several risk assessment approaches have been developed for buildings, detailed risk analysis procedures for infrastructure components have been lacking in prior studies. The proposed framework is showcased by its application to a system of interconnected structures at a power substation in Tehran. Finite element models of structures are developed and validated in accordance with previous experiments. The uncertainties in the material, mass, and geometric properties of structures are described by random variables that are input to the finite element model. An artificial ground motion model is employed to comprehensively consider uncertainty in ground motion. Monte Carlo sampling is subsequently conducted on the library of probabilistic models. The analysis resulted in the loss distribution in the life cycle of structures. Additionally, the loss associated with six earthquake scenarios having specific magnitudes and return periods is computed. The application provides insight into the most vulnerable equipment in the considered system. Furthermore, introduced risk measures can guide stakeholders to make risk-based decisions to optimize design or prioritize a retrofit of infrastructure components under conditions of uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 511
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Life-cycle failure probability analysis of deteriorated RC bridges under multiple hazards of earthquakes and strong winds[J]. Zheng Xiaowei,Li Hongnan.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2022(03)
  • [2] Analyzing uncertainties involved in estimating collapse risk with and without considering uncertainty probability distribution parameters[J]. Mohammad Amin Bayari,Naser Shabakhty,Esmaeel Izadi Zaman Abadi.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2022(01)
  • [3] Numerical investigation of the seismic response of a UHV composite bypass switch retrofitted with wire rope isolators[J]. Yang Zhenyu,Xie Qiang,He Chang,Xue Songtao.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2021(01)
  • [4] Practical seismic resilience evaluation and crisis management planning through GIS-based vulnerability assessment of buildings[J]. Peyman Narjabadifam,Ramin Hoseinpour,Mohammad Noori,Wael Altabey.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2021(01)
  • [5] A benchmark city for seismic resilience assessment[J]. Shang Qingxue,Guo Xiaodong,Li Quanwang,Xu Zhen,Xie Linlin,Liu Chaofeng,Li Jichao,Wang Tao.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2020(04)
  • [6] Fuzzy rule based seismic risk assessment of one-story precast industrial buildings[J]. Mehmet Palanci.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2019(03)
  • [7] Experimental and analytical studies on multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic protection of porcelain electrical equipment[J]. Bai Wen,Dai Junwu,Zhou Huimeng,Yang Yongqiang,Ning Xiaoqing.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2017(04)
  • [8] Field reconnaissance of the 2007 Niigata-Chuetsu Oki earthquake[J]. Georgios Apostolakis,Nurhan Ecemis,Seda Dogruel.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2007(04)
  • [9] Seismic reliability analysis of large electric power systems[J]. 何军,李杰.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2004(01)
  • [10] Seismic performance and fragility analysis of power distribution concrete poles
    Baghmisheh, Amir Ghahremani
    Mahsuli, Mojtaba
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 150