骨水泥分布位置与含量对股骨反转子间骨折应力、位移影响的有限元分析

被引:2
|
作者
张乾龙 [1 ,2 ]
买合木提·亚库甫 [1 ,2 ]
宋晨辉 [1 ,2 ]
刘修信 [1 ,2 ]
任政 [1 ,2 ]
刘宇哲 [1 ,2 ]
木牙沙尔·阿布都沙拉木 [1 ,2 ]
萨吉旦·艾克拜尔 [1 ,2 ]
冉建 [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] 新疆医科大学
[2] 新疆医科大学第六附属医院
关键词
内植物; 股骨近端防旋髓内钉; 股骨反转子骨折; 有限元分析; 骨水泥; 增强型股骨近端防旋髓内钉;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.3 [骨骼手术];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
背景:股骨近端防旋髓内钉是治疗骨质疏松性反转子间骨折的首选治疗方案,其中骨水泥增强可减少股骨近端防旋髓内钉切出与切穿的概率,但目前没有相关生物力学研究证明骨水泥的含量及位置对骨折端应力及位移的影响。目的:通过有限元方法分析骨水泥增强型股骨近端防旋髓内钉中骨水泥含量及位置对老年骨质疏松性股骨反转子间骨折应力、应变及位移的影响。方法:采用Mimics软件建立健康成年女性右侧股骨模型,并在Geometric软件中进行光滑处理,利用Solidworks软件分别建立股骨近端防旋髓内钉(无骨水泥、头端球形1 mL骨水泥、头端球形2 mL骨水泥、头端球形3.4 mL骨水泥、螺旋刀片周围圆柱形5 mL骨水泥)5种类型内固定方式及股骨反转子间骨折(AO分型31-A3.1型)模型,装配后,在Ansys软件中比较5种模型内植物的总应力分布、应力峰值及位移。结果与结论:(1)无骨水泥与头端球形1 mL、头端球形2 mL、头端球形3.4 mL、螺旋刀片周围圆柱形5 mL骨水泥增强型股骨近端防旋髓内钉组内植物的应力峰值分别为571.07 MPa(位于螺旋刀片与主钉交界处),495.45 MPa(位于螺旋刀片与主钉交界处)、467.20 MPa(位于主钉与远端螺钉连接处)、642.70 MPa(位于主钉与远端螺钉连接处)、458.58 MPa(位于远端与主钉交界处);(2)无骨水泥与头端球形1 mL、头端球形2 mL、头端球形3.4 mL、螺旋刀片周围圆柱形5 mL骨水泥增强型股骨近端防旋髓内钉组内植物的最大位移量分别为9.260 5,7.589 1,7.316 8,6.790 7,6.615 7 mm,均位于股骨头近端;(3)结果显示,采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定股骨反转子间骨折时,骨水泥增强较未增强有明显的力学稳定性,并且螺旋刀片周围5 mL骨水泥的增强效果最好,对于老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折是优先选择。
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 340
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] 钉道强化股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年A3.3型股骨转子间骨折:最佳骨水泥量有限元分析
    陈心敏
    李文标
    熊凯凯
    熊晓燕
    郑利钦
    李木生
    郑永泽
    林梓凌
    [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25 (09) : 1404 - 1409
  • [2] 脆性股骨颈骨折患者股骨颈骨密度及结构的变化
    庄华烽
    李毅中
    林金矿
    姚学东
    俞海明
    潘源城
    [J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2014, (03) : 282 - 285
  • [3] Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Wang, Yanhua
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Lijia
    Xiong, Chen
    Zhang, Xiaomeng
    Yu, Kai
    Ju, Jiabao
    Chen, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Dianying
    Zhang, Yingze
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (09) : 2245 - 2255
  • [4] Clinical effect of cement-enhanced APFN in the treatment of elderly osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures
    NI, X. -H.
    ZHU, X. -Y.
    ZHANG, Z. -Y.
    ZHANG, L.
    REN, L. -B.
    WU, J. -S.
    WANG, L. -J.
    ZHAO, Q. -M.
    ZHANG, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (11) : 3872 - 3877
  • [5] Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of two intertrochanteric fractures-a comparative finite element study
    Zheng, Liqin
    Chen, Xinmin
    Zheng, Yongze
    He, Xingpeng
    Wu, Jingxiong
    Lin, Ziling
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [6] Global Trends in Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Research From 2001 to 2020: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study
.[J].Zhang Ze;Qiu Yudian;Zhang Yawen;Zhu Yi;Sun Fengpo;Liu Junchuan;Zhang Tongyi;Wen Liangyuan.Frontiers in Surgery.2021,
  • [7] Trend and Economic Implications of Implant Selection in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database From 2007 to 2017.[J].Smith Lauren;Albersheim Melissa;Blaschke Breanna L.;Parikh Harsh R.;Solfelt David A.;Van Heest Ann E.;Cunningham Brian P..Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2021,
  • [8] Bone cement augmentation of femoral nail head elements increases their cut-out resistance in poor bone quality– A biomechanical study.[J].Sermon An;Zderic Ivan;Khatchadourian Roberto;Scherrer Simon;Knobe Matthias;Stoffel Karl;Gueorguiev Boyko.Journal of Biomechanics.2021,
  • [9] Intramedullary nailing confers an increased risk of medial migration compared to dynamic hip screw fixation in unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures
    Law, Gin Way
    Wong, Yoke Rung
    Gardner, Antony
    Ng, Yau Hong
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (11): : 3440 - 3445
  • [10] Cement augmentation for trochanteric fracture in elderly: A systematic review.[J].Stramazzo Leonardo;Ratano Salvatore;Monachino Francesco;Pavan Davide;Rovere Giuseppe;Camarda Lawrence.Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2020, prepublish