Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer,Goldmann Applanation Tonometry,and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals

被引:0
作者
Ping-Bo Ouyang
机构
关键词
intraocular pressure; tonometry; central corneal thickness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R770.4 [眼科诊断学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
AIM:To investigate the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by a Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA),as well as the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP as measured by ORA,Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT),and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT).· METHODS:A total of 158 healthy individuals (296 eyes) were chosen randomly for measurement of IOP.After CCT was measured using A-ultrasound (A-US),IOP was measured by ORA,GAT,and DCT devices in a randomized order.The IOP values acquired using each of the three tonometries were compared,and the relationship between CCT and IOP values were analyzed separately.Two IOP values,Goldmann-correlated IOP value (IOPg) and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc),were got using ORA.Three groups were defined according to CCT:1) thin cornea (CCT<520μm);2) normal-thickness cornea (CCT:520-580μm);and 3) thick cornea (CCT>580μm) groups.· RESULTS:In normal subjects,IOP measurements were 14.95±2.99mmHg with ORA (IOPg),15.21±2.77mmHg with ORA(IOPcc),15.22±2.77mmHg with GAT,and 15.49±2.56mmHg with DCT.Mean differences were 0.01±2.29mmHg between IOPcc and GAT(P >0.05) and 0.28±2.20mmHg between IOPcc and DC(P >0.05).There was a greater correlation between IOPcc and DCT(r =0.946,P =0.000) than that between IOPcc and GAT (r =0.845,P =0.000).DCT had a significant correlation with GAT (r =0.854,P =0.000).GAT was moderately correlated with CCT (r =0.296,P <0.001),while IOPcc showed a weak but significant correlation with CCT (r =0.155,P =0.007).There was a strong negative correlation between CCT and the difference between IOPcc and GAT(r =-0.803,P =0.000),with every 10 increase in CCT resulting in an increase in this difference of 0.35mmHg.The thick cornea group (CCT>580μm) showed the least significant correlation between IOPcc and GAT (r =0.859,P= 0.000);while the thin cornea group (CCT<520μm) had the most significant correlation between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.926,P =0.000).The correlated differences between IOPcc and DCT were not significant in any of the three groups (P >0.05).· CONCLUSION:Measurement of IOP by ORA has high repeatability and is largely consistent with GAT measurements.Moreover,the ORA measurements are affected only to a small extent by CCT,and are likely to be much closer to the real IOP value than GAT.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计及非接触眼压计测量眼压的对比研究 [J].
程玲艳 ;
崔娟莲 ;
段宣初 .
眼科, 2011, 20 (01) :33-37
[2]   中央角膜厚度对压平眼压计测量值的影响 [J].
段宣初 ;
吴勤 ;
蒋幼芹 ;
卿国平 ;
江冰 ;
石晶明 .
中国实用眼科杂志, 2004, (10) :778-782
[3]   The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Among Selected Ethiopian Communities [J].
Gelaw, Yeshigeta ;
Kollmann, Martin ;
Irungu, Njuguna M. ;
Ilako, Dunera R. .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (08) :514-518
[4]   Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes [J].
Meyenberg, Alexander ;
Iliev, Milko E. ;
Eschmann, Raphael ;
Frueh, Beatrice E. .
CORNEA, 2008, 27 (03) :305-310
[5]   Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for glaucoma [J].
Mehdizadeh, Alireza ;
Hoseinzadeh, Amin ;
Fazelzadeh, Afsoon .
MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2007, 69 (06) :1205-1207
[6]   Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on Intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer [J].
Medeiros, Felipe A. ;
Weinreb, Robert N. .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (05) :364-370
[7]   Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility [J].
Herdener, Sonja ;
Pache, Mona ;
Lautebach, Sonja ;
Funk, Jens .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 245 (07) :1027-1030
[8]   Intraocular pressure measurement - Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry [J].
Schneider, E ;
Grehn, F .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) :2-6
[9]   Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness [J].
Doyle, A ;
Lachkar, Y .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2005, 14 (04) :288-292