Bolus norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maternal hypotension during elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blinded study

被引:7
作者
Wang Xian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Mao Mao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhang SuSu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wang ZhaoHui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Xu ShiQin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Shen XiaoFeng
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology
[2] Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
[3] Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
[4] Nanjing
[5] Jiangsu
[6] China
关键词
Norepinephrine; Phenylephrine; Cardiac output; Cesarean section;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: In recent years, norepinephrine has attracted increasing attention for the management of maternal hypotension during elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Intermittent bolus is a widely used administration paradigm for vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia in China. Thus, in this randomized, double-blinded study, we compared the efficacy and safety of equivalent bolus norepinephrine and phenylephrine for rescuing maternal post-spinal hypotension.Methods: In a tertiary women’s hospital in Nanjing, China, 102 women were allocated with computer derived randomized number to receive prophylactic 8 μg norepinephrine (group N;n = 52) or 100 μg phenylephrine (group P;n = 50) immediately post-spinal anesthesia, followed by an extra bolus of the same dosage until delivery whenever maternal systolic blood pressure became lower than 80% of the baseline. Our primary outcome was standardized maternal cardiac output (CO) reading from spinal anesthesia until delivery analyzed by a two-step method. Other hemodynamic parameters related to vasopressor efficacy and safety were considered as secondary outcomes. Maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes were collected as well.Results: Compared to group P, women in group N had a higher CO (standardized CO 5.8 ± 0.9vs. 5.3 ± 1.0 L/min,t = 2.37,P = 0.02) and stroke volume (SV, standardized SV 73.6 ± 17.2vs. 60.0 ± 13.3 mL,t = 4.52,P < 0.001), and a lower total peripheral resistance (875 ± 174vs. 996 ± 182 dyne·s/cm5,t = 3.44,P < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of bradycardia was lower in group N than in group P (2%vs. 14%,P= 0.023), along with an overall higher standardized heart rate (78.8 ± 11.6vs. 75.0 ± 7.3 beats/min,P = 0.049). Other hemodynamics, as well as maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes, were similar in two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Compared to equivalent phenylephrine, intermittent bolus norepinephrine provides a greater CO for management of maternal hypotension during elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia; however, no obvious maternal or neonatal clinical advantages were observed for norepinephrine.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 516
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Xu, Shiqin ;
Shen, Xiaofeng ;
Liu, Shijiang ;
Yang, Jianjun ;
Wang, Xian .
MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (05)
[2]  
The Efficacy and Safety of Norepinephrine and Its Feasibility as a Replacement for Phenylephrine to Manage Maternal Hypotension during Elective Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia[J] . Xian Wang,Xiaofeng Shen,Shijiang Liu,Jianjun Yang,Shiqin Xu,Kazunori Uemura.BioMed Research International . 2018
[3]   International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia [J].
Kinsella, S. M. ;
Carvalho, B. ;
Dyer, R. A. ;
Fernando, R. ;
McDonnell, N. ;
Mercier, F. J. ;
Palanisamy, A. ;
Sia, A. T. H. ;
Van de Velde, M. ;
Vercueil, A. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (01) :71-92
[4]  
A Random-allocation Graded Dose–Response Study of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine for Treating Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery[J] . Warwick D. Ngan Kee.Anesthesiology . 2017
[5]  
Norepinephrine Intermittent Intravenous Boluses to Prevent Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Sequential Allocation Dose-Finding Study[J] . Desire N. Onwochei,Warwick D. Ngan Kee,Lillia Fung,Kristi Downey,Xiang Y. Ye,Jose C.A. Carvalho.Anesthesia & Analgesia . 2017
[6]  
An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial for comparison of continuous phenylephrine versus norepinephrine infusion in prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery[J] . M.C. Vallejo,A.F. Attaallah,O.M. Elzamzamy,D.T. Cifarelli,A.L. Phelps,G.R. Hobbs,R.E. Shapiro,P. Ranganathan.International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia . 2016
[7]   Differential effects of phenylephrine and norepinephrine on peripheral tissue oxygenation during general anaesthesia A randomised controlled trial [J].
Poterman, Marieke ;
Vos, Jaap Jan ;
Vereecke, Hugo E. M. ;
Struys, Michel M. R. F. ;
Vanoverschelde, Henk ;
Scheeren, Thomas W. L. ;
Kalmar, Alain F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 32 (08) :571-580
[8]   Randomized Double-blinded Comparison of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine for Maintenance of Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery [J].
Ngan Kee, Warwick D. ;
Lee, Shara W. Y. ;
Ng, Floria F. ;
Tan, Perpetua E. ;
Khaw, Kim S. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 122 (04) :736-745
[9]  
Effects of norepinephrine on mean systemic pressure and venous return in human septic shock*[J] . Romain Persichini,Serena Silva,Jean-Louis Teboul,Mathieu Jozwiak,Denis Chemla,Christian Richard,Xavier Monnet.Critical Care Medicine . 2012 (12)
[10]  
Ephedrine for spinal hypotension during elective caesarean section: the final nail in the coffin?[J] . R. A. DYER,B. M. BICCARD.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand . 2012 (7)