A comparative study of pseudo-static slope stability analysis using different design codes

被引：0

作者：

Xinguang Yang ^{[1
]}

Endi Zhai ^{[2
]}

Yuan Wang ^{[3
]}

Zhongbo Hu ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co, Ltd, MCC Group

[2] Goldwind Science & Technology Co, Ltd

[3] College of Mechanics and Materials, Hohai University

[4] China Three Gorges Corporation

来源：

Water Science and Engineering | 2018年 / 11卷 / 04期

关键词：

Earthquake; Slope stability; Pseudo-static method; Design code;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TU435 [土动力学与振动地基];

学科分类号：

0801 ; 080104 ; 0815 ;

摘要：

Many researchers have developed new calculation methods to analyze seismic slope stability problems, but the conventional pseudo-static method is still widely used in engineering design due to its simplicity. Based on the Technical Code for Building Slope Engineering（GB 50330-2013） of China and the Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California（SP117）, a comparative study on the pseudo-static method was performed. The results indicate that the largest difference between these two design codes lies in determination of the seismic equivalence reduction factor( feq). The GB 50330-2013 code specifies a single value for feq of 0.25. In SP117, numerous factors,such as magnitude and distance, are considered in determining feq. Two case studies show that the types of slope stability status evaluated by SP117 are in agreement with those evaluated by the seismic time-history stability analysis and Newmark displacement analysis. The factors of safety evaluated by SP117 can be used in practice for safe design. However, the factors of safety evaluated by GB 50330-2013 are risky for slope seismic design.

引用

页码：310 / 317

页数：8

共 27 条

[1] 汶川8.0级地震触发崩滑灾害机制及其地质力学模式 [J].

黄润秋 .

岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28 (06) :1239-1249

[2] 地震作用下岩体边坡破坏机制及稳定性研究进展 [J].

寇昊 ;

李宁 ;

郭双枫 .

水利水电科技进展, 2018, 38 (04) :81-88

[3]

Guidelines for Seismic Design of Earth Dams and Embankments. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur and Gujarat State Disaster Mitigation Authority. . 2005

[4]

Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California. California Geological Survey. Special Publication 117A.CGS . 2008

[5]

Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Landslide Hazards in California. Blake,T.F,Hollingsworth,R.A,Stewart,J.P. . 2002

[6]

Empirical Ground Motion Models. Abrahamson,N.A,Silva,W.J. . 1996

[7]

PEER Ground Motion Database[DB]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database . 2010

[8]

Time history analysis method of slope seismic stability. Liu,H.L,Fei,K,Gao,Y.F. Rock and Soil Mechanics . 2003

[9]

A seismic landslide susceptibility rating of geologic units based on analysis of characteristics of landslides triggered by the 17 January, 1994 Northridge, California earthquake[J] . Mario Parise,Randall W. Jibson. &nbspEngineering Geology . 2000 (3)

[10] Characteristics of rapid giant landslides in China [J].

Wen, Baoping ;

Wang, Sijing ;

Wang, Enzhi ;

Zhang, Jianmin .

LANDSLIDES, 2004, 1 (04) :247-261

← 1 2 3 →