Evaluation of Different Predictor Models for Detailed Soil Particle-Size Distribution

被引:0
|
作者
Fatemeh MESKINI-VISHKAEE [1 ]
Naser DAVATGAR [2 ]
机构
[1] Soil and Water Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)  2. Soil and Water R
关键词
Akaike’s information criterion; Fredlund model; Gray model; mean absolute error; root mean square error; soil texture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S152 [土壤物理学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
An accurate mathematical representation of soil particle-size distribution(PSD) is required to estimate soil hydraulic properties or to compare texture measurements using different classification systems. However, many databases do not contain full PSD data,but instead contain only the clay, silt, and sand mass fractions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abilities of four PSD models(the Skaggs model, the Fooladmand model, the modified Gray model GM(1,1), and the Fredlund model) to predict detailed PSD using limited soil textural data and to determine the effects of soil texture on the performance of the individual PSD model.The mean absolute error(MAE) and root mean square error(RMSE) were used to measure the goodness-of-fit of the models, and the Akaike’s information criterion(AIC) was used to compare the quality of model fits. The performance of all PSD models except the GM(1,1) improved with increasing clay content in soils. This result showed that the GM(1,1) was less dependent on soil texture.The Fredlund model was the best for describing the PSDs of all soil textures except in the sand textural class. However, the GM(1,1) showed better performance as the sand content increased. These results indicated that the Fredlund model showed the best performance and the least values of all evaluation criteria, and can be used using limited soil textural data for detailed PSD.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 164
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Different Predictor Models for Detailed Soil Particle-Size Distribution
    Meskini-Vishkaee, Fatemeh
    Davatgar, Naser
    PEDOSPHERE, 2018, 28 (01) : 157 - 164
  • [2] Effect of texture on the performance of soil particle-size distribution models
    Hwang, SI
    GEODERMA, 2004, 123 (3-4) : 363 - 371
  • [3] Evaluation of models for fitting soil particle-size distribution using UNSODA and a Brazilian dataset
    Vaz, Carlos Manoel Pedro
    Ferreira, Ednaldo Jose
    Posadas, Aldolfo Durand
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2020, 21
  • [4] Comparison of mathematical models for fitting particle-size distribution curves
    da Silva, EM
    Lima, JEFW
    Rodrigues, LN
    de Azevedo, JA
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2004, 39 (04) : 363 - 370
  • [5] Approximation of the soil particle-size distribution curve using a NURBS curve
    Marhoul, Adaa marie
    Herza, Tomas
    Kozak, Josef
    Janku, Jaroslava
    Jehlicka, Jan
    Boruvka, Lubos
    Mmecek, Karel
    Jetmar, Miroslav
    Polak, Petr
    SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2025, 20 (01) : 16 - 31
  • [6] Particle-Size Distribution Models for the Conversion of Chinese Data to FAO/USDA System
    Wei Shangguan
    Dai, YongJiu
    Garcia-Gutierrez, Carlos
    Yuan, Hua
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [7] Use of a lognormal distribution model for estimating soil water retention curves from particle-size distribution data
    Hwang, Sang Il.
    Choi, Sang Il.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 323 (1-4) : 325 - 334
  • [8] PERFORMANCE OF A RECIPROCAL SHAKER IN MECHANICAL DISPERSION OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSIS
    Dourado, Thayse Aparecida
    Simoes da Silva, Laura Fernanda
    Marinho, Mara de Andrade
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2012, 36 (04): : 1131 - 1148
  • [9] The particle-size distribution in soils: Problems of the methods of study, interpretation of the results, and classification
    E. V. Shein
    Eurasian Soil Science, 2009, 42 : 284 - 291
  • [10] The particle-size distribution in soils: Problems of the methods of study, interpretation of the results, and classification
    Shein, E. V.
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2009, 42 (03) : 284 - 291