The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in evaluating the size of early-stage breast neoplasms

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng Wang [1 ]
Hongzhi Chen [1 ]
Xiaobin Ma [2 ]
Zhijun Dai [2 ]
Shuai Lin [2 ]
Huafeng Kang [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oncology,The Central Hospital of Xi’an City
[2] Department of Oncology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
关键词
breast neoplasm; magnetic resonance imaging(MRI); ultrasound; pathology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R737.9 [乳腺肿瘤]; R445.2 [核磁共振成像];
学科分类号
100207 ; 100214 ;
摘要
Objective Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. Accurate evaluation of the size and extent of the tumor is crucial in selecting a suitable surgical method for patients with breast cancer. Both overestimation and underestimation have important adverse effects on patient care. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of breast magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) and ultrasound(US) examination for measuring the size and extent of early-stage breast neoplasms.Methods The longest diameter of breast tumors in patients with T;N;M;invasive breast cancer preparing for breast-conserving surgery(BCS) was measured preoperatively by using both MRI and US and their accuracy was compared with that of postoperative pathologic examination. If the diameter difference was within 2 mm, it was considered to be consistent with pathologic examination.Results A total of 36 patients were imaged using both MRI and US. The mean longest diameter of the tumors on MRI, US, and postoperative pathologic examination was 20.86 mm ± 4.09 mm(range: 11–27 mm), 16.14 mm ± 4.91 mm(range: 6–26 mm), and 18.36 mm ± 3.88 mm(range: 9–24 mm). US examination underestimated the size of the tumor compared to that determined using pathologic examination(t = 3.49, P < 0.01), while MRI overestimated it(t =-6.35, P < 0.01). The linear correlation coefficients between the image measurements and pathologic tumor size were r = 0.826(P < 0.01) for MRI and r = 0.645(P < 0.01) for US. The rate of consistency of MRI and US compared to that with pathologic examination was 88.89% and 80.65%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between them(χ;= 0.80, P > 0.05).Conclusion MRI and US are both effective methods to assess the size of breast tumors, and they maintain good consistency with pathologic examination. MRI has a better correlation with pathology. However, we should be careful about the risk of inaccurate size estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for prediction of residual tumor size in early breast cancer within the ADAPT subtrials
    Monika Graeser
    Simone Schrading
    Oleg Gluz
    Kevin Strobel
    Christopher Herzog
    Lale Umutlu
    Alex Frydrychowicz
    Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer
    Rachel Würstlein
    Ralph Culemann
    Christine Eulenburg
    Jascha Adams
    Henrik Nitzsche
    Anna Prange
    Sherko Kümmel
    Eva-Maria Grischke
    Helmut Forstbauer
    Michael Braun
    Jochem Potenberg
    Raquel von Schumann
    Bahriye Aktas
    Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
    Nadia Harbeck
    Christiane K. Kuhl
    Ulrike Nitz
    Breast Cancer Research, 23
  • [22] COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND ULTRASOUND IN EVALUATING LIVER SIZE IN GAUCHER PATIENTS
    GLENN, D
    THURSTON, D
    GARVER, P
    BEUTLER, E
    ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA, 1994, 92 (04) : 187 - 189
  • [23] Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in combination with mammography for screening early-stage breast cancer
    Su, Weiwei
    Hou, Xiaoming
    Yu, Bo
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 23 (02) : 290 - 297
  • [24] Comparison of impedance cardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of cardiac function in early-stage breast cancer patients
    Piastopoulou, Erifyli
    Ali, Parvaiz
    Bertelli, Gianfilippo
    Heatley, Martyn
    Moe, Maung
    Murugesan, Chandramohan
    Stratton, Gareth
    Lewis, Michael
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2021, 42 (10)
  • [25] Comments on "Evaluation of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspect Breast Lesions''
    An, Yongyu
    CLINICS, 2020, 75
  • [26] NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE MICROSCOPIC OCULAR IMAGING FOR THE DETECTION OF EARLY-STAGE CATARACT
    AHN, CB
    ANDERSON, JA
    JUH, SC
    KIM, I
    GARNER, WH
    CHO, ZH
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1989, 30 (07) : 1612 - 1617
  • [27] Comparison of 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating early-stage osteoarthritis of the hip
    Kobayashi, Naomi
    Inaba, Yutaka
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    Ike, Hiroyuki
    Kubota, So
    Inoue, Tomio
    Saito, Tomoyuki
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [28] Differentiation of early-stage parkinsonisms using neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging
    Ohtsuka, Chigumi
    Sasaki, Makoto
    Konno, Kanako
    Kato, Kanako
    Takahashi, Junko
    Yamashita, Fumio
    Terayama, Yasuo
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2014, 20 (07) : 755 - 760
  • [29] Accuracy of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the size of breast cancer
    Shi, Xian-Quan
    Dong, Yunyun
    Tan, Xiaoqu
    Yang, Peipei
    Wang, Chunmei
    Feng, Wei
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Qian, Linxue
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2022, 82 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [30] Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging
    Sugimoto, H
    Takeda, A
    Masuyama, J
    Furuse, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (01) : 185 - 192