Shikani Optical Stylet versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cervical Spondylosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
作者
Xu Mao [1 ]
Li XiaoXi [2 ]
Guo XiangYang [1 ]
Wang Jun
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
[2] Department of Anesthesiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
关键词
Airway; Cervical Spondylosis; Intubation; Laryngoscope; Optical Stylet;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.3 [骨骼手术];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Airway management is critical in patients with cervical spondylosis, a population with a high incidence of difficult airway. Intubation with Shikani Optical Stylet (SOS) has become increasingly popular in difficult airway. We compared the effects of intubation with SOS versus Macintosh laryngoscope (MLS) in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylosis. Methods: A total of 270 patients scheduled for elective surgery for cervical spondylosis of spinal cord and nerve root type from August 2012 to January 2016 were enrolled and randomly allocated to the MLS or SOS group by random numbers. Patients were evaluated for difficult airway preoperatively, and Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopy classification was determined during anesthesia induction. Difficult airway was defined as Cormack-Lehane Grades III–IV. Patients were intubated with the randomly assigned intubation device. The success rate, intubation time, required assistance, immediate complications, and postoperative complaints were recorded. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square test, and continuous variables were analyzed by independent samplest-test or rank sum test.Results: The success rate of intubation among normal airways was 100% in both groups. In patients with difficult airway, the success rates in the MLS and SOS groups were 84.2% and 94.1%, respectively (P = 0.605). Intubation with SOS took longer compared with MLS (normal airway: 25.1 ± 5.8 s vs. 24.5 ± 5.7 s,P = 0.426; difficult airway: 38.5 ± 8.5 s vs. 36.1 ± 8.2 s,P = 0.389). Intubation with SOS required less assistance in patients with difficult airway (5.9% vs. 100%,P < 0.001). The frequency of postoperative sore throat was lower in SOS group versus MLS group in patients with normal airway (22.0% vs. 34.5%,P = 0.034).Conclusions: SOS is a safe and effective airway management device in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylosis. Compared with MLS, SOS appears clinically beneficial for intubation, especially in patients with difficult airway. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-16007821; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=13203.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 302
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   A comparison between left molar direct laryngoscopy and the use of a Bonfils intubation fibrescope for tracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway [J].
Gupta, Anju ;
Thukral, Seema ;
Lakra, Archana ;
Kumar, Sushil .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2015, 62 (06) :609-617
[2]  
Comparison of three tracheal intubation techniques in thyroid tumor patients with a difficult airway: a randomized controlled trial[J] . Liu Ling,Yue Hui,Li Jincheng.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre . 2014 (5)
[3]  
A comparison of conventional tube and EndoFlex tube for tracheal intubation in patients with a cervical spine immobilisation[J] . Gaszynska Ewelina,Stankiewicz-Rudnicki Michal,Wieczorek Andrzej,Gaszynski Tomasz.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine . 2013 (3)
[4]  
Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway[J] . Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum,Carin A. Hagberg,Robert A. Caplan,Casey D. Blitt,Richard T. Connis,David G. Nickinovich,Jonathan L. Benumof,Frederic A. Berry,Robert H. Bode,Frederick W. Cheney,Orin F. Guidry,Andranik Ovassapian.Anesthesiology . 2013 (2)
[5]   Effectiveness and safety of the Levitan FPS Scope™ for tracheal intubation under general anesthesia with a simulated difficult airwayEfficacité et innocuité du Levitan FPS Scope™ pour l’intubation trachéale sous anesthésie générale avec des voies aériennes difficiles simulées [J].
Tracy Kok ;
Ronald B. George ;
Dolores McKeen ;
Narendra Vakharia ;
Aaron Pink .
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2012, 59 (8) :743-750
[6]  
The Shikani optical stylet as an alternative to the GlideScope? videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult intubations – a randomised controlled trial[J] . D. S.Phua,C. L.Mah,C. F.Wang.Anaesthesia . 2012 (4)
[7]   Video-Assisted Versus Conventional Tracheal Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients [J].
Dhonneur, Gilles ;
Abdi, Widad ;
Ndoko, Serge K. ;
Amathieu, Roland ;
Risk, Nabil ;
El Housseini, Lodfi ;
Polliand, Claude ;
Champault, Gerard ;
Combes, Xavier ;
Tual, Loic .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2009, 19 (08) :1096-1101
[8]  
Evaluation of the Airtraq? and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation*[J] . C. H.Maharaj,J. F.Costello,B. H.Harte,J. G.Laffey.Anaesthesia . 2008 (2)
[9]  
Predicting Difficult Intubation in Apparently Normal Patients: A Meta-analysis of Bedside Screening Test Performance[J] . Toshiya Shiga,Zen’ichiro Wajima,Tetsuo Inoue,Atsuhiro Sakamoto.Anesthesiology . 2005 (2)
[10]  
The Seeing Stylet: a new device for tracheal intubation[J] . F. Agrò,R. Cataldo,M. Carassiti,F. Costa.Resuscitation . 2000 (3)