Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm

被引:0
作者
ZHANG Zhicai
CHEN Li
机构
[1] Army Logistical University of PLA
[2] Logistics University of PAP
关键词
method for grey relation projection decision-making; military supply power in war; deployment plan; optimization; analytic hierarchy process(AHP); rough entropy method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
E233 [军需勤务与国防物资储备];
学科分类号
1107 ;
摘要
In military service joint operations, when there are more operational forces, more multifarious materials are consumed, the support is more complex and fuzzy, the deployment of personnel is more rapid, and the support provided by wartime military material support powers can be more effective. When the principles,requirements, influencing factors and goals of military material support forces are deployed in wartime, an evaluation indicator system is established. Thus, a new combined empowerment method based on an analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is developed to calculate the subjective weights, and the rough entropy method is used to calculate the objective weights. Combination weights can be obtained by calculating the weight preference coefficient error, which is determined by combining the cooperative game method and the minimum deviation into objectives. This approach can determine the grey relation projection coefficient and synthesize the measure scheme superiority to finally optimize the deployment plan using the grey relation projection decision-making method. The results show that the method is feasible and effective;it can provide a more scientific and practical decision-making basis for the military material support power deployment in wartime.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 796
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Tri-level decision-making with multiple followers: Model, algorithm and case study [J].
Han, Jialin ;
Lu, Jie ;
Hu, Yaoguang ;
Zhang, Guangquan .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 311 :182-204
[22]   An integrated decision-making model for sustainable photovoltaic module supplier selection based on combined weight and cumulative prospect theory [J].
Wu, Yunna ;
Ke, Yiming ;
Xu, Chuanbo ;
Li, Lingwenying .
ENERGY, 2019, 181 :1235-1251
[23]   Purchase decision making of garage equipment using an integrated fuzzy AHP and grey relation analysis method [J].
James, Ajith Tom ;
Asjad, Mohammad ;
Panchal, Rahul .
GREY SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2023, 13 (02) :238-260
[24]   Cost-analysis-based decision-making methods and processes for bridges [J].
Wang, Y. Q. ;
Chen, A. R. ;
Ruan, X. .
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE EXTENSION, 2014, :2518-2526
[25]   A VIKOR-based group decision-making approach to software reliability evaluation [J].
Yue, Chuan .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (18) :9445-9464
[26]   Fuzzy Einstein-based decision-making model for the evaluation of site selection criteria of floating photovoltaic system [J].
Melek, Abiddin Berhan ;
Gokmener, Serkan ;
Haspolat, Emre ;
Cicek, Doga Derman ;
Deveci, Muhammet ;
Oguz, Elif ;
Khorasanchi, Mahdi .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 301
[27]   Facility layout problem: an approach based on a group decision-making system and psychoclonal algorithm [J].
Khilwani, N. ;
Shankar, R. ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (04) :895-927
[28]   Development of a ship route decision-making algorithm based on a real number grid method [J].
Kim, S. W. ;
Jang, H. K. ;
Cha, Y. J. ;
Yu, H. S. ;
Lee, S. J. ;
Yu, D. H. ;
Lee, A. R. ;
Jin, E. J. .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2020, 101
[29]   Developing a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Based on a Three-Layer Virtual Internet of Things Algorithm Model to Rank Players' Value [J].
Chang, Che-Wei .
MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (14)
[30]   Multi-objective decision-making model based on CBM for an aircraft fleet [J].
Luo, Bin ;
Lin, Lin .
ADVANCES IN MATERIALS, MACHINERY, ELECTRONICS II, 2018, 1955