基于优势的心理氛围对创新行为的影响机制研究

被引：44
作者：
丁贺
林新奇
徐洋洋
机构：
[1] 中国人民大学劳动人事学院
来源：
南开管理评论 | 2018年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词：
基于优势的心理氛围; 计划行为理论; 创新自我效能感; 创新意愿; 创新行为;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F272.92 [人事管理];
学科分类号：
1201 ;
摘要：
本文以计划行为理论为基础,试图构建基于优势的心理氛围、创新自我效能感、创新意愿和员工创新行为之间的链式中介模型。通过来自5家科研设计单位的214个样本数据,利用结构方程模型和中介效应检验方法对该模型进行验证,结果表明:基于优势的心理氛围对创新自我效能感、创新意愿均具有正向影响,但对员工创新行为不存在直接影响;创新自我效能感和创新意愿均中介基于优势的心理氛围对员工创新行为产生影响;基于优势的心理氛围还通过创新自我效能感和创新意愿的链式中介对员工创新行为产生影响。
引用
收藏
页码：28 / 38
页数：11
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Characteristics of an organizational environment which stimulate and inhibit creativity .2 Alencar,S. D. E,Bruno-Faria,M. Journal of Creative Behavior . 1997
[22]   组织创新气氛与激励偏好对员工创新行为的交互效应研究 [J].
刘云 ;
石金涛 .
管理世界, 2009, (10) :88-101+114+188
[23]   计划行为理论述评 [J].
段文婷 ;
江光荣 .
心理科学进展, 2008, (02) :315-320
[24]  
Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research[J] . Lawrence R. James,Carol C. Choi,Chia-Huei Emily Ko,Patrick K. McNeil,Matthew K. Minton,Mary Ann Wright,Kwang-il Kim.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology . 2007 (1)
[25]  
Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs[J] . Wilmar B. Schaufeli,Marisa Salanova.Anxiety, Stress & Coping . 2007 (2)
[26]  
Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students[J] . Ronald A. Beghetto.Creativity Research Journal . 2006 (4)
[27]  
The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?[J] . Christina E. Shalley.Journal of Management . 2004 (6)
[28]  
Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the "Strength" of the HRM System[J] . David E. Bowen,Cheri Ostroff.The Academy of Management Review . 2004 (2)
[29]  
Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance[J] . Pamela Tierney,Steven M. Farmer.The Academy of Management Journal . 2002 (6)
[30]  
Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback[J] . Madan M. Pillutla,Xiao-Ping Chen.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 1999 (2)
1234