Minimally invasive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review

被引:2
作者
Renato Patrone [1 ]
Francesco Izzo [2 ]
Raffaele Palaia [2 ]
Vincenza Granata [3 ]
Guglielmo Nasti [4 ]
Alessandro Ottaiano [4 ]
Gilda Pasta [5 ]
Andrea Belli [2 ]
机构
[1] PhD ICTH, University of Naples Federico II
[2] Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G.Pascale,IRCCS  3. Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G.
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.8 [胆囊、胆道肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and a dismal prognosis.Radical surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment.Despite the increasing acceptance of laparoscopic liver resection for surgical treatment of malignant liver diseases, its use for ICC is not commonly performed.In fact, to achieve surgical free margins a major resection and/or vascular and/or biliary reconstructions is often needed, as well as an associated lymph node dissection.AIM To review and summarize the current evidences on the minimally invasive resection of ICC.METHODS A systematic review of the literature based on the criteria predetermined by the investigators was performed from the 1stof January 2009 up to the 1stof January 2021 in 4 databases(Pub Med, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases). All retrospective and prospective studies reporting on the comparative outcomes of open vs minimally invasive treatment of ICC were included. An evaluation of manuscripts quality was achieved using Methodological Index for NonRandomized Studies criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.RESULTS After a systematic search 9 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the all 3012 included patients, 2450 were operated by an open approach and 562 by a minimally invasive(laparoscopic) approach. Baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes and oncological outcomes were collected and analyzed, highlighting values with a statistical significant difference between patients treated with open or laparoscopic approach. Shorter hospital stay and lower intraoperative blood losses were reported by some Authors in minimally invasive surgery, on the contrary, in the open group there was a higher number of lymphadenectomies and a higher percentage of major hepatectomies.CONCLUSION Minimally invasive resection of ICC has some short-term benefits and it is safe and feasible only in selected centers with a high experience in laparoscopic approach for liver surgery. Minimally invasive surgery, actually, was considered mainly in patients with a tumor with a diameter < 5 cm, without invasion of main biliary duct or main vessel and no vascular or biliary reconstructions were planned. Further studies are needed to elucidate its impact on long term oncologic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2203 / 2215
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
Mils for HCC:the state of art. Belli A,Fantini C,Cioffi L,D’’Agostino A,Belli G. Updates Surg . 2015
[12]  
Oncologic Impact of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma:a Propensity Score-Matched Study. Kim SH,Han DH,Choi GH,Choi JS,Kim KS. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2019
[13]  
Robotic surgery of gallbladder cancer. Belli A,Patrone R,Albino V,Leongito M,Piccirillo M,Granata V,Pasta G,Palaia R,Izzo F. Mini-invasive Surg . 2020
[14]  
Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Lee W,Park JH,Kim JY,et al. Surgical Endoscopy . 2016
[15]  
Surgical Approach for Long-term Survival of Patients With IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinoma:A Multi-institutional Analysis of 434Patients. Ribero D,Pinna AD,Guglielmi A,Ponti A,Nuzzo G,Giulini SM,Aldrighetti L,Calise F,Gerunda GE,Tomatis M,Amisano M,Berloco P,Torzilli G,Capussotti L. Archives of Surgery . 2012
[16]  
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery:From Indication to Implementation. Abu Hilal M,Aldrighetti L,Dagher I,Edwin B,Troisi RI,Alikhanov R,Aroori S,Belli G,Besselink M,Briceno J,Gayet B,D’’Hondt M,Lesurtel M,Menon K,Lodge P,Rotellar F,Santoyo J,Scatton O,Soubrane O,Sutcliffe R,Van Dam R,White S,Halls MC,Cipriani F,Van der Poel M,Ciria R,Barkhatov L,Gomez-Luque Y,Ocana-Garcia S,Cook A,Buell J,Clavien PA,Dervenis C,Fusai G,Geller D,Lang H,Primrose J,Taylor M,Van Gulik
[17]  
Outcomes after Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma:External Validation and Comparison of Progno stic Models. Doussot A,Groot-Koerkamp B,Wiggers JK,Chou J,Gonen M,DeMatteo RP,Allen PJ,Kingham TP,D’’Angelica MI,Jarnagin WR. Journal of the American College of Surgeons . 2015
[18]   Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing [J].
Ciria, Ruben ;
Cherqui, Daniel ;
Geller, David A. ;
Briceno, Javier ;
Wakabayashi, Go .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (04) :761-777
[19]   Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Uy, Billy James ;
Han, Ho-Seong ;
Yoon, Yoo-Seok ;
Cho, Jai Young .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (04) :272-277
[20]   Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Bridgewater, John ;
Galle, Peter R. ;
Khan, Shahid A. ;
Llovet, Josep M. ;
Park, Joong-Won ;
Patel, Tushar ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. ;
Gores, Gregory J. .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 60 (06) :1268-1289