Impacts of Total Energy Consumption Control and Energy Quota Allocation on China′s Regional Economy Based on A 30-region Computable General Equilibrium Analysis

被引:0
作者
LI Na [1 ,2 ]
SHI Minjun [1 ,2 ]
SHANG Zhiyuan [1 ,2 ]
YUAN Yongna [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[2] Research Center on Fictitious Economy & Data Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
total energy consumption control; energy quota allocation; computable general equilibrium(CGE) model; induced energy technology improvements;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F206 [能源管理];
学科分类号
020201 ;
摘要
This paper examined the impacts of the total energy consumption control policy and energy quota allocation plans on China′s regional economy. This research analyzed the influences of different energy quota allocation plans with various weights of equity and efficiency, using a dynamic computable general equilibrium(CGE) model for 30 province-level administrative regions. The results show that the efficiency-first allocation plan costs the least but widens regional income gap, whereas the outcomes of equity-first allocation plan and intensity target-based allocation plan are similar and are both opposite to the efficiency-first allocation plan′ outcome. The plan featuring a balance between efficiency and equity is more feasible, which can bring regional economic losses evenly and prevent massive interregional migration of energy-related industries. Furthermore, the effects of possible induced energy technology improvements in different energy quota allocation plans were studied. Induced energy technology improvements can add more feasibility to all allocation plans under the total energy consumption control policy. In the long term, if the policy of the total energy consumption control continues and more market-based tools are implemented to allocate energy quotas, the positive consequences of induced energy technology improvements will become much more obvious.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 671
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Impact of Regional Development on Carbon Emission: Empirical Evidence Across Countries[J]. LI Guoping,YUAN Yuan.Chinese Geographical Science. 2014(05)
[2]   基于环境ZSG-DEA的我国省区节能指标分配 [J].
孙作人 ;
周德群 ;
周鹏 ;
苗壮 .
系统工程, 2012, (01) :84-90
[3]   中国CO2排放总量控制区域分解方案研究 [J].
王金南 ;
蔡博峰 ;
曹东 ;
周颖 ;
刘兰翠 .
环境科学学报, 2011, 31 (04) :680-685
[4]   低碳经济政策对区域发展格局演进的影响——基于动态多区域CGE模型的模拟分析 [J].
李娜 ;
石敏俊 ;
袁永娜 .
地理学报, 2010, 65 (12) :1569-1580
[5]   低碳技术发展对中国实现减排目标的作用 [J].
石敏俊 ;
周晟吕 .
管理评论, 2010, 22 (06) :48-53+47
[6]   区域差异和区域联系对中国区域政策效果的作用:基于中国八区域CGE模型 [J].
李娜 ;
石敏俊 ;
王飞 .
系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29 (10) :35-44
[7]   碳排放权分配与碳排放权交易 [J].
陈文颖 ;
吴宗鑫 .
清华大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, (12) :16-19+23
[8]   China's strategy for energy development and climate change mitigation [J].
He Jiankun ;
Yu Zhiwei ;
Zhang Da .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :7-13
[9]  
Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey[J] . Till Requate.Ecological Economics . 2005 (2)
[10]  
Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes[J] . Michel den Elzen,Paul Lucas,Detlef van Vuuren.Energy Policy . 2004 (16)