Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy

被引:1
作者
Joon Hyun Cho [1 ]
Eun Joo Goo [1 ]
Kyeong Ok Kim [1 ]
Si Hyung Lee [1 ]
Byung Ik Jang [1 ]
Tae Nyeun Kim [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine
关键词
Inadequate bowel preparation; Additional colon cleansing; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R574.62 [结肠疾病];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND No consensus has been reached in patients suspected of having inadequate bowel preparation regarding optimal salvage methods, which negatively affects the efficacy and quality of colonoscopy. The most ideal and reasonable rescue option involves early suspicion and identification of patients with inadequate preparation before sedation, additional oral ingestion of a suitable preparation formulation, and same-day colonoscopy.AIM To compare 0.5-L and 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid(PEG +Asc) as additional bowel cleansing methods after a 2-L split-dose PEG + Asc regimen in patients with expected inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy.METHODS Individuals with expected inadequate bowel preparation based on last stool form, such as turbid liquid, particulate liquid, or liquid with small amounts of feces, were randomized to either a 0.5-L PEG + Asc group or a 1-L PEG + Asc group. The primary endpoint was bowel preparation as assessed using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale(ABPS) and Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS) scores. The secondary endpoints were cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate(PDR), adenoma detection rate(ADR), individual compliance with additional PEG + Asc, and patient satisfaction.RESULTS Initially, 98 patients were included, but 8 were later excluded due to withdrawal of consent to participate in the study. Adequate bowel preparation(as assessed by ABPS) was observed in 80.9%(38/47) of subjects in the 0.5-L group and in88.4%(38/43) of subjects in the 1-L group(P = 0.617). Mean total BBPS was 6.7 points in the 0.5-L group and 7.0 points in the 1-L group(P = 0.458). ADRs and PDRs were similar in the two groups, and cecal intubation and withdrawal times were not significantly different. However, mean patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the 0.5-L group(P = 0.041).CONCLUSION The bowel cleaning efficacy of additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc was not inferior to that of 1-L PEG + Asc. Additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc is worthwhile when inadequate bowel preparation is expected before colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
[11]  
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study[J] . Florian Froehlich,Vincent Wietlisbach,Jean-Jacques Gonvers,Bernard Burnand,John-Paul Vader.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2005 (3)
[12]   Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy [J].
Rex, DK ;
Imperiale, TF ;
Latinovich, DR ;
Bratcher, LL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (07) :1696-1700
[13]  
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: Efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda[J] . Craig A Aronchick,William H Lipshutz,Scott H Wright,Francis Dufrayne,Garrett Bergman.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2000 (3)