Comparative study on mode split discrete choice models

被引:0
|
作者
Xianlong Chen [1 ]
Xiaoqian Liu [2 ]
Fazhi Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Transport Planning and Research Institute
[2] Transportation Planning and Design Division,Architectural Design&Research Institute of Tongji University(Group) Co.,Ltd.
关键词
Discrete choice model; Mode split; NL; MMNL; HEV; MNP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U116 [合理运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Discrete choice model acts as one of the most important tools for studies involving mode split in the context of transport demand forecast.As different types of discrete choice models display dieir merits and restrictions diversely,how to properly select the specific type among discrete choice models for realistic application still remains to be a tough problem.In this article,five typical discrete choice models for transport mode split are,respectively,discussed,which includes multinomial logit model,nested logit model(NL),heteroscedastic extreme value model,multinominal probit model and mixed multinomial logit model(MMNL).The theoretical basis and application attributes of these five models are especially analysed with great attention,and they are also applied to a realistic intercity case of mode split forecast,which results indicating that NL model does well in accommodating similarity and heterogeneity across alternatives,while MMNL model serves as the most effective method for mode choice prediction since it shows the highest reliability with the least significant prediction errors and even outperforms the other four models in solving the heterogeneity andsimilarity problems.This study indicates that conclusions derived from a single discrete choice model are not reliable,and it is better to choose the proper model based on its characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 272
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study on mode split discrete choice models
    Chen, Xianlong
    Liu, Xiaoqian
    Li, Fazhi
    JOURNAL OF MODERN TRANSPORTATION, 2013, 21 (04): : 266 - 272
  • [2] A Comparative Empirical Study of Discrete Choice Models in Retail Operations
    Berbeglia, Gerardo
    Garassino, Agustin
    Vulcano, Gustavo
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (06) : 4005 - 4023
  • [3] A systematic comparative evaluation of machine learning classifiers and discrete choice models for travel mode choice in the presence of response heterogeneity
    Salas, Patricio
    De la Fuente, Rodrigo
    Astroza, Sebastian
    Antonio Carrasco, Juan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 193
  • [4] A systematic comparative evaluation of machine learning classifiers and discrete choice models for travel mode choice in the presence of response heterogeneity
    Salas, Patricio
    De la Fuente, Rodrigo
    Astroza, Sebastian
    Carrasco, Juan Antonio
    Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 193
  • [5] INTRA-HOUSEHOLD DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS OF MODE CHOICE AND RESIDENTIAL LOCATION
    Picard, Nathalie
    de Palma, Andre
    Dantan, Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 (03) : 419 - 445
  • [6] ON THE USE OF MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES AND DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS IN MODE CHOICE ANALYSIS
    Benjdiya, Ouissam
    Rouky, Naoufal
    Benmoussa, Othmane
    Fri, Mouhsene
    LOGFORUM, 2023, 19 (03) : 331 - 345
  • [7] Application of discrete choice models for mode and destination choice in a large scale demand model
    Koppelhuber, Florian
    Kriebernegg, Georg
    Luger, Bernhard
    Aspaeck, Jacqueline
    2017 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (MT-ITS), 2017, : 469 - 473
  • [8] A comparative study of models for port choice
    Chou, CC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EASTERN ASIA SOCIETY FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, VOL 5, 2005, 5 : 608 - 616
  • [9] Discrete Choice Models
    Pecakova, Iva
    Vojacek, Ondrej
    APPLICATIONS OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS IN ECONOMY: AMSE 2009, 2009, : 351 - 359
  • [10] Discrete choice models
    Bierlaire, M
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND DECISION AID METHODOLOGIES IN TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, 1998, 166 : 203 - 227