Clinical benefits of intracoronary high-dose tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:0
作者
张焕基 [1 ,2 ]
张新霞 [1 ,2 ]
吴剑胜 [1 ,2 ]
胡雪松 [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cardiology,The Fourth Hospital of Shenzhen
[2] Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College
关键词
tirofiban; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; intracoronary;
D O I
10.16268/j.cnki.44-1512/r.2010.02.005
中图分类号
R542.22 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To investigate the benefits of intracoronary high-dose tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) .Methods Fifty-eight patients with STEMI presented within 12 h of symptoms were randomly allocated to study group (n = 28,intracor-onary high-dose tirofiban) and control group (n = 30,intravenous high-dose tirofiban) .The culprit vessels were targe-ted with primary PCI in all patients.Clinical characteristics,angiographic findings,brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 7-day and in-hospital outcomes were compared between groups,as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE,including death,reinfarction,worsening heart failure and target vessel revascu-larization) at 30-day clinical follow-up.Results Compared with the control group,the study group showed better thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades immediately after PCI (96.4% vs 76.7% ,P = 0.02) .The 30-day composite major adverse cardiac events rate was lower in the study group (3.6% vs 23.3% ,P = 0.02) ,and the LVEF and BNP in the study group at 7 days was better than that in the control group (P = 0.01 and 0.02,respec-tively) .No significant difference in hemorrhagic complications in hospital between groups was noted (P = 0.61) .Conclusions The study indicates that intracoronary high-dose bolus administration of tirofiban for patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI can significantly improve the reperfusion level in the infarct area and clinical outcomes at 30 days follow-up.It is better and safer to apply intravenous bolus injection for improving coronary flow,LVEF and short-term clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 92
页数:4
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention [J].
Shen, Jie ;
Zhang, Qi ;
Zhang, Rui Yan ;
Zhang, Jian Sheng ;
Hu, Jian ;
Yang, Zhen-kun ;
Zheng, Ai Fang ;
Zhang, Xian ;
Shen, Wei Feng .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2008, 19 (04) :271-277
[2]   Increased ability of tirofiban to maintain its inhibitory effects on the binding of fibrinogen to platelets in blood from patients with and without diabetes mellitus [J].
Schneider, DJ ;
Keating, FK ;
Baumann, PQ ;
Whitaker, DA ;
Sobel, BE .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2006, 17 (01) :57-61
[3]   Quantification by flow cytometry of the efficacy of and interindividual variation of platelet inhibition induced by treatment with tirofiban and abciximab [J].
Holmes, MB ;
Kabbani, SS ;
Terrien, CM ;
Watkins, MW ;
Sobel, BE ;
Schneider, DJ .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2001, 12 (03) :245-253
[4]  
Achieving tissue-level perfusion in the setting of acute myocardial infarction[J] . Debabrata Mukherjee,David J Moliterno.The American Journal of Cardiology . 2000 (8)
[5]  
Effect of Intracoronary Tirofiban in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Cor-onary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome .2 Tong-Guo Wu,Qiang Zhao,Wei-Guang Huanget al. Circ J . 2008