Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis

被引：1

作者：

Jia-Men Shen ^{[1
]}

Jia-Ying Zhao ^{[1
]}

Tao Ye ^{[1
]}

Li-Feng Gong ^{[1
]}

Hui-Peng Wang ^{[1
]}

Wen-Jie Chen ^{[1
]}

Yuan-Kun Cai ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University

来源：

World Journal of Clinical Cases | 2020年 / 19期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R735.37 [];

学科分类号：

100214 ;

摘要：

BACKGROUND Transanal minimally invasive surgery(TAMIS) is a good choice for resection of rectal neoplasms. Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) is also widely used in the treatment of benign rectal tumors such as rectal polyps and rectal adenomas. However, no studies have compared the outcome of TAMIS and EMR.AIM To compare the short-term outcomes after TAMIS and EMR for rectal carcinoid and benign tumors(including rectal polyps and adenomas).METHODS From January 2014 to January 2019, 44 patients who received TAMIS and 53 patients who received EMR at The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai were selected. Primary outcomes(surgical-related) were operating time, blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, rate of resection margin involvement and lesion fragmentation rate. The secondary outcomes were complications such as hemorrhage, urinary retention, postoperative infection and reoperation.RESULTS No significant differences were observed in terms of blood loss(12.48 ± 8.00 mL for TAMIS vs 11.45 ± 7.82 mL for EMR, P = 0.527) and length of postoperative hospital stay(3.50 ± 1.87 d for TAMIS vs 2.72 ± 1.98 d for EMR, P = 0.065) between the two groups. Operating time was significantly shorter for EMR compared with TAMIS(21.19 ± 9.49 min vs 49.95 ± 15.28 min, P = 0.001). The lesion fragmentation rate in the EMR group was 22.6%(12/53) and was significantly higher than that(0%, 0/44) in the TAMIS group(P = 0.001). TAMIS was associated with a higher urinary retention rate(13.6%, 6/44 vs 1.9%, 1/53 P = 0.026) and lower hemorrhage rate(0%, 0/44 vs 18.9%, 10/53 P = 0.002). A significantly higher reoperation rate was observed in the EMR group(9.4%, 5/53 vs 0%, 0/44 P = 0.036).CONCLUSION Compared with EMR, TAMIS can remove lesions more completely with effective hemostasis and lower postoperative hemorrhage and reoperation rates. TAMIS is a better choice for the treatment of rectal carcinoids.

引用

页码：4311 / 4319

页数：9

共 19 条

[1]

Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J] . Freddie Bray BSc,MSc,PhD,Jacques Ferlay ME,Isabelle Soerjomataram MD,MSc,PhD,Rebecca L. Siegel MPH,Lindsey A. Torre MSPH,Ahmedin Jemal PhD,DVM.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2018 (6)

[2]

Colorectal cancer screening for average‐risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society[J] . Andrew M.D. Wolf MD,Elizabeth T.H. Fontham MPH,DrPH,Timothy R. Church PhD,Christopher R. Flowers MD,MS,Carmen E. Guerra MD,Samuel J. LaMonte MD,Ruth Etzioni PhD,Matthew T. McKenna MD,Kevin C. Oeffinger MD,Ya‐Chen Tina Shih PhD,Louise C. Walter MD,Kimberly S. Andrews BA,Otis W. Brawley MD,Durado Brooks MD,MPH,Stacey A. Fedewa PhD,MPH,Deana Manassaram‐Baptiste PhD,MPH,Rebecca L. Siegel

[3]

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results[J] . S. H. E. M. Clermonts,Y. T. van Loon,A. H. W. Schiphorst,D. K. Wasowicz,D. D. E. Zimmerman.International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 2017 (12)

[4]

A critical appraisal of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) in the treatment of rectal adenoma: a 4-year experience with 51 cases[J] . Sven-Petter Haugvik,Sigrid Groven,Johan Bondi,Torolf V?gan,Stig Ove Brynhildsvoll,Ole Christian Olsen.Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 2016 (7)

[5]

Colonic Foreign Body Retrieval Using a Modified TAMIS Technique with Standard Instruments and Trocars[J] . Shamir O. Cawich,Fawwaz Mohammed,Richard Spence,Matthew Albert,Vijay Naraynsingh,Vasileios Papadopoulos.Case Reports in Emergency Medicine . 2015

[6]

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): New Treatment for Early Rectal Cancer and Large Rectal Polyps-Experience of an Italian Center[J] . Maglio,Riccardo,Muzi,Gallinella Marco,Massimo,Massimo Meucci,Masoni,Luigi.The American Surgeon . 2015 (3)

[7]

Learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single-center experience[J] . Antonio Maya,Andrew Vorenberg,Myrian Oviedo,Giovanna Silva,Steven D. Wexner,Dana Sands.Surgical Endoscopy . 2014 (5)

[8]

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS–TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution[J] . S. Atallah,B. Martin-Perez,M. Albert,T. deBeche-Adams,G. Nassif,L. Hunter,S. Larach.Techniques in Coloproctology . 2014 (5)

[9] Transanal TAMIS total mesorectal excision (TME)-a work in progress [J].

Wexner, S. D. ;

Berho, M. .

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (05) :423-425

[10] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms [J].

Hompes, R. ;

Rauh, S. M. ;

Ris, F. ;

Tuynman, J. B. ;

Mortensen, N. J. .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (05) :578-581

← 1 2 →