Second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with regorafenib or cabozantinib: Multicenter French clinical experience in real-life after matching

被引:0
|
作者
Xavier Adhoute [1 ]
Marie De Matharel [2 ]
Laurent Mineur [3 ]
Guillaume Pénaranda [4 ]
Dann Ouizeman [2 ]
Clemence Toullec [3 ]
Albert Tran [2 ]
Paul Castellani [1 ]
Armelle Rollet [3 ]
Valérie Oules [1 ]
Hervé Perrier [1 ]
Si Nafa Si Ahmed [1 ]
Marc Bourliere [1 ]
Rodolphe Anty [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, H?pital Saint-Joseph
[2] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, H?pital Universitaire de l'Archet  3. Department of Oncology, Institut Sainte-Catherine  4. Depar
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.7 [肝肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Starting a second-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is a common situation. The only therapeutic options in France are two broadspectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs), regorafenib(REG) and cabozantinib(CBZ), but no comparative real-life studies are available.AIM To evaluate the progression-free survival(PFS) of patients treated with REG or CBZ, we investigated the disease control rate(DCR), overall survival(OS), and safety of both drugs. To identify the variables associated with disease progression over time.METHODS A retrospective multicenter study was performed on the clinical data of patients attending one of three referral centers(Avignon, Marseille, and Nice) between January 2017 and March 2021 using propensity score matching. PFS and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis(MA) of progression risk factors over time was performed in matched-pair groups.RESULTS Fifty-eight patients 68(62-74) years old with HCC, Barcelona clinic liver cancer(BCLC) B/C(86%), Child-Pugh(CP)-A/B(24%) received REG for 3.4(1.4-10.5) mo as second-line therapy. Twentyeight patients 68(60-73) years, BCLC B/C(75%), CP-A/B(25%) received CBZ for 3.7(1.8-4.9) mo after first-line treatment with sorafenib [3(2-4)(CBZ) vs 4(2.9-11.8) mo(REG), P = 0.0226]. Twenty percent of patients received third-line therapy. After matching, PFS and DCR were not significantly different after a median follow-up of 6.2(2.7-11.7) mo(REG) vs 5.2(4-7.2) mo(CBZ), P = 0.6925. There was no difference in grade 3/4 toxicities, dose reductions, or interruptions. The OS of CP-A patients was 8.3(5.2-24.8) vs 4.9(1.6-11.7) mo(CP-B), P = 0.0468. The MA of risk factors for progression over time identified C-reactive protein(CRP) > 10 mg/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR) > 3, and aspartate aminotransferase(AST) > 45 IU as predictive factors.CONCLUSION This multicenter indirect comparative study found no significant difference in PFS between REG and CBZ as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. Elevated levels of inflammatory markers(CRP and NLR) and AST were associated with non-control of TKIs over time. A 2-mo online progression risk calculation is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:1510 / 1527
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with regorafenib or cabozantinib: Multicenter French clinical experience in real-life after matching
    Adhoute, Xavier
    De Matharel, Marie
    Mineur, Laurent
    Penaranda, Guillaume
    Ouizeman, Dann
    Toullec, Clemence
    Tran, Albert
    Castellani, Paul
    Rollet, Armelle
    Oules, Valerie
    Perrier, Herve
    Ahmed, Si Nafa Si
    Bourliere, Marc
    Anty, Rodolphe
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 14 (08) : 1510 - 1527
  • [2] Real-Life Experience of Regorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hou, Jing-Yu
    Xiao, Ya-ting
    Huang, Jing-Bo
    Jiang, Xin-Hua
    Jiang, Kai
    Li, Xun
    Xu, Li
    Chen, Min-Shan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [3] Regorafenib as second-line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Duffy, Austin G.
    Greten, Tim F.
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03) : 141 - 142
  • [4] Regorafenib as second-line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Austin G. Duffy
    Tim F. Greten
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2017, 14 : 141 - 142
  • [5] Regorafenib combined with immunotherapy versus regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study
    Li, B-K.
    Yuan, Y.
    Qiao, L.
    He, W.
    Wang, G.
    Chen, H.
    Zhang, B.
    Fuxi, H.
    Qiu, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S596 - S596
  • [6] Cabozantinib as a Second-Line Agent in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    LIVER CANCER, 2018, 7 (02) : 123 - 133
  • [7] Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Successes with Regorafenib in Second-line Therapy
    Weiss, Johannes
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2017, 55 (05):
  • [8] Regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Interim results from the multicenter real-world study
    Lu, J.
    Zhu, H.
    Guo, J.
    Teng, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S671 - S671
  • [9] Cost Effectiveness of Regorafenib as Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Hutton, David W.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (19) : 3725 - 3731
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib as second-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liao, Weiting
    Huang, Jiaxing
    Hutton, David
    Zhu, Guiqi
    Wu, Qiuji
    Wen, Feng
    Bai, Liangliang
    Li, Qiu
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (12) : 2408 - 2416