Coronal Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidney: Agreement with Axial Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Imaging in Terms of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values

被引:0
|
作者
Wang Hai-Yi
Wang Jia
Tang Ye-Huan
Ye Hui-Yi
Ma Lin
机构
[1] China
[2] Beijing 100853
[3] Department of Radiology
[4] Hebei 056001
[5] Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital
[6] Handan Central Hospital
关键词
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient; Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Humans; Kidney; Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R445.2 [核磁共振成像]; R692 [肾疾病];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Coronal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values have gradually become applied (following conventional axial DW-MRI) in the renal analysis. To explore whether data obtained using coronal DW-MRI are comparable with those derived using axial DW-MRI, this preliminary study sought to assess the agreement in renal ADC values between coronal DW-MRI and axial DW-MRI.Methods: Thirty-four healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study; written consents were obtained. All subjects underwent respiratory-triggered axial and coronal DW-MRI using a 1.5-MR system with b values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the two DW-MRI sequences were measured and statistically compared using the pairedt-test. The extent of agreement of ADC values of the upper pole, mid-pole, and lower pole of the kidney; the mean ADC values of the left kidney and right kidney; and the mean ADC values of the bilateral kidneys were evaluated via calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) or Bland–Altman method between the two DW-MRI sequences.Results: The SNR of coronal DW-MR images was statistically inferior to that of axial DW-MR images (P < 0.001). The ICCs of the ADC values of each region of interest, and the mean ADC values of bilateral kidneys, between the two sequences, were greater than 0.5, and the mean ADCs of the bilateral kidneys demonstrated the highest ICC (0.869; 95% confidence interval: 0.739–0.935). In addition, 94.1% (32/34), 94.1% (32/34), and 97.1% (31/34) of the ADC bias was inside the limits of agreement in terms of the mean ADC values of the left kidneys, right kidneys, and bilateral kidneys when coronal and axial DWI-MRI were compared.Conclusions: ADC values derived using coronal DW-MRI exhibited moderate-to-good agreement to those of axial DW-MRI, rendering the former an additional useful DW-MRI method, and causing the ADC values derived using the two types of DW-MRI to be comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 503
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronal Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidney: Agreement with Axial Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Imaging in Terms of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Wang, Hai-Yi
    Wang, Jia
    Tang, Ye-Huan
    Ye, Hui-Yi
    Ma, Lin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (04) : 499 - 503
  • [2] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the detection of gastric carcinoma
    Liang, Jianxiao
    Lv, Hailian
    Liu, Qingwei
    Li, Hongfu
    Wang, Jiangquan
    Cui, Engang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 15639 - 15647
  • [3] Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Mauro
    Purpura, Pierpaolo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso V.
    Picone, Dario
    Dispensa, Nino
    Lunetta, Claudio
    Bruno, Alberto
    Raso, Ludovica
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [4] Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging
    Soydan, Levent
    Demir, Ali Aslan
    Torun, Mehmet
    Cikrikcioglu, Makbule Arar
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 16 (10) : 1278 - 1289
  • [5] Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis
    Koinuma, M
    Ohashi, I
    Hanafusa, K
    Shibuya, H
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 22 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen
    Schmid-Tannwald, C.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Zech, C. J.
    RADIOLOGE, 2011, 51 (03): : 195 - 204
  • [7] Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values as prognostic factors in multiple myeloma
    Costachescu, Dan
    Ionita, Ioana
    Borsi, Ema-Cristina
    Potre, Ovidiu
    Potre, Cristina
    Navolan, Dan-Bogdan
    Blidisel, Alexandru
    Ionita, Hortensia
    Erimescu, Adelina
    Pop, Gheorghe Nicusor
    Malita, Daniel Claudiu
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (02)
  • [8] Application of apparent diffusion coefficient and exponent apparent diffusion coefficient values in magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate benign and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors
    Wang, Yu-Xing
    Yuan, Ming-Zhi
    Wen, Zhao-Xia
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (01) : 401 - 405
  • [9] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps for differentiating peripartum neurologic complications
    Pratesi, Andrea
    Falcini, Mario
    Beninato, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 114 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [10] Apparent diffusion coefficient by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a sole biomarker for staging and prognosis of gastric cancer
    Giganti, Francesco
    Ambrosi, Alessandro
    Chiari, Damiano
    Orsenigo, Elena
    Esposito, Antonio
    Mazza, Elena
    Albarello, Luca
    Staudacher, Carlo
    Del Maschio, Alessandro
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (02) : 118 - 126