The Supply Chain Contract Design under Cap-and-Trade Mechanism with Free Riding

被引:0
作者
Fu-qiang Wang [1 ]
Jun Liu [1 ]
机构
[1] Collaborative Innovation Center of Resource-conserving & Environment-friendly Society and Ecological Civilization, School of Business,Central South University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon emissions reduction; free riding; supply chain contract design; cap-and-trade;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F274 [企业供销管理];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This paper studies the influence of free riding on enterprise product pricing and carbon emissions reduction investment, as well as the contract design to achieve supply chain coordination under the carbon trading mechanism. First, we discuss the situation where carbon emissions reduction investment affects the product price and income. It demonstrates that the optimal investment of the upstream manufacturer increases with the degree of the free riding of the downstream manufacturer. The upstream manufacturer can improve their carbon reduction investment and the whole supply chain achieves Pareto improvement when the investment cost sharing contract is introduced. Nevertheless, under the cost-sharing contract the optimal investment of the decentralized supply chain is still lower than that of the centralized supply chain, and only in some particular cases can the two types of supply chain achieve equal total profits. Then, we preliminarily explore the situation where the product price and income is influenced by carbon emissions reduction investment. The consequences indicate that the optimal investment of the upstream manufacturers in this situation is less than the former one’s, and the transfer payment mechanism is able to improve the level of the supply chain overall carbon emissions-reduction. Moreover, compared to the former situation, the effects of free riding of the downstream manufacturer are even more serious. The conclusions can provide some intellectual support for manufacturing enterprises to make reasonable emissions reduction strategies and coordinate the supply chain existing in free riding.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 286 +323
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   低碳环境下供应链差异化定价与协调机制研究 [J].
徐春秋 ;
赵道致 ;
原白云 .
运筹与管理, 2015, 24 (01) :19-26
[2]   考虑公平偏好的低碳化供应链契约协调研究 [J].
李媛 ;
赵道致 .
管理工程学报, 2015, 29 (01) :156-161
[3]   CVaR准则下双渠道供应链订货与信息搭便车行为 [J].
徐兵 ;
刘露 .
工业工程, 2014, 17 (05) :99-107
[4]   基于自执行旁支付契约的供应商与制造商减排博弈与协调 [J].
夏良杰 ;
赵道致 ;
何龙飞 ;
李友东 .
管理学报, 2014, 11 (05) :750-757
[5]   碳配额交易体系下企业低碳产品定价及最优碳排放策略 [J].
马秋卓 ;
宋海清 ;
陈功玉 .
管理工程学报, 2014, 28 (02) :127-136
[6]   两级供应链减排与促销的合作策略 [J].
王芹鹏 ;
赵道致 .
控制与决策, 2014, 29 (02) :307-314
[7]   考虑公平偏好的低碳化供应链两部定价契约协调 [J].
李媛 ;
赵道致 .
管理评论, 2014, 26 (01) :159-167
[8]   低碳供应链企业减排合作策略研究 [J].
谢鑫鹏 ;
赵道致 .
管理科学, 2013, 26 (03) :108-119
[9]   存在搭便车时双渠道供应链的收益共享契约附视频 [J].
丁正平 ;
刘业政 .
系统工程学报, 2013, (03) :370-376
[10]   服务搭便车的电子渠道与传统渠道协调机制 [J].
艾兴政 ;
马建华 ;
陈忠 ;
唐小我 .
系统工程学报, 2011, 26 (04) :507-514