Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings

被引:1
|
作者
Lu Jin
Huang Yue-Qin
Liu Zhao-Rui
Cao Xiao-Lan
机构
[1] Beijing 100191
[2] China
[3] Ministry of Health (Peking University)
[4] Peking University Institute of Mental Health
[5] Key Laboratory of Mental Health
[6] Peking University Sixth Hospital
关键词
Composite International Diagnostic Interview; Concordance; Mental Disorder; Reliability; Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Fourth Edition Axis I Disorders; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) is a fully structured lay-administered diagnostic interview for the assessment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the Chinese CIDI in diagnosing mental disorders in psychiatric settings.Methods: We recruited 208 participants, of whom 148 were patients from two psychiatric hospitals and 60 healthy people from communities. These participants were administered with CIDI by six trained lay interviewers and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I, gold standard) by two psychiatrists. Agreement between CIDI and SCID-I was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Individual-level CIDI-SCID diagnostic concordance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and Cohen’s K.Results: Substantial to excellent CIDI to SCID concordance was found for any substance use disorder (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.926), any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.807) and any mood disorder (AUC = 0.806). The concordance between the CIDI and the SCID for psychotic and eating disorders is moderate. However, for individual mental disorders, the CIDI-SCID concordance for bipolar disorders (AUC = 0.55) and anorexia nervosa (AUC = 0.50) was insufficient.Conclusions: Overall, the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has acceptable validity in diagnosing the substance use disorder, anxiety disorder and mood disorder among Chinese adult population. However, we should be cautious when using it for bipolar disorders and anorexia nervosa.
引用
收藏
页码:2462 / 2466
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Which Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale is Most Useful in Medical Settings and Nursing Homes? Diagnostic Validity Meta-Analysis
    Mitchell, Alex J.
    Bird, Vicky
    Rizzo, Maria
    Meader, Nicholas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 18 (12) : 1066 - 1077
  • [42] Reliability, validity and acceptability of the traditional Chinese version of the carer support needs assessment tool in Hong Kong palliative care settings
    Hui-Lin Cheng
    Doris Yin Ping Leung
    Po Shan Ko
    Ming Wai Chung
    Wai Man Lam
    Po Tin Lam
    Andrew Leung Luk
    Simon Ching Lam
    BMC Palliative Care, 20
  • [43] Examining the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LC)
    Macfarlane, Duncan
    Chan, Anson
    Cerin, Ester
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2011, 14 (03) : 443 - 450
  • [44] Reliability, validity and acceptability of the traditional Chinese version of the carer support needs assessment tool in Hong Kong palliative care settings
    Cheng, Hui-Lin
    Leung, Doris Yin Ping
    Ko, Po Shan
    Chung, Ming Wai
    Lam, Wai Man
    Lam, Po Tin
    Luk, Andrew Leung
    Lam, Simon Ching
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [45] Validity of the Korean Version of DIVA-5: A Semi-Structured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD
    Hong, Minha
    Kooij, J. J. Sandra
    Kim, Bongseog
    Joung, Yoo-Sook
    Yoo, Hanik K.
    Kim, Eui-Jung
    Lee, Soyoung Irene
    Bhang, Soo-Young
    Lee, Seung Yup
    Han, Doug Hyun
    Lee, Young Sik
    Bahn, Geon Ho
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 2371 - 2376
  • [46] Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: Feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward
    Mordal, J.
    Gundersen, O.
    Bramness, J. G.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 25 (03) : 172 - 177
  • [47] The Composite International Diagnostic Interview in low- and middle-income countries
    Lee, Sing
    Tsang, Adley
    Guo, Wan-jun
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 195 (02) : 178 - 178
  • [48] One-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese web-based version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for major depression in a working population
    Shimoda, Haruki
    Inoue, Akiomi
    Tsuno, Kanami
    Kawakami, Norito
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (03) : 204 - 212
  • [49] Test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Version 4 (DISC-IV)
    Ho, TP
    Leung, PWL
    Lee, CC
    Tang, CP
    Hung, SF
    Kwong, SL
    Lucas, CP
    Lieh-Mak, F
    Shaffer, D
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 46 (10) : 1135 - 1138
  • [50] Concordance between Composite International Diagnostic Interview and self-reports of depressive symptoms: a re-analysis
    Rosenstrom, Tom
    Elovainio, Marko
    Jokela, Markus
    Pirkola, Sami
    Koskinen, Seppo
    Lindfors, Olavi
    Keltikangas-Jarvinen, Liisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (03) : 213 - 225