Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings

被引:1
|
作者
Lu Jin
Huang Yue-Qin
Liu Zhao-Rui
Cao Xiao-Lan
机构
[1] Beijing 100191
[2] China
[3] Ministry of Health (Peking University)
[4] Peking University Institute of Mental Health
[5] Key Laboratory of Mental Health
[6] Peking University Sixth Hospital
关键词
Composite International Diagnostic Interview; Concordance; Mental Disorder; Reliability; Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Fourth Edition Axis I Disorders; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) is a fully structured lay-administered diagnostic interview for the assessment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the Chinese CIDI in diagnosing mental disorders in psychiatric settings.Methods: We recruited 208 participants, of whom 148 were patients from two psychiatric hospitals and 60 healthy people from communities. These participants were administered with CIDI by six trained lay interviewers and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I, gold standard) by two psychiatrists. Agreement between CIDI and SCID-I was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Individual-level CIDI-SCID diagnostic concordance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and Cohen’s K.Results: Substantial to excellent CIDI to SCID concordance was found for any substance use disorder (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.926), any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.807) and any mood disorder (AUC = 0.806). The concordance between the CIDI and the SCID for psychotic and eating disorders is moderate. However, for individual mental disorders, the CIDI-SCID concordance for bipolar disorders (AUC = 0.55) and anorexia nervosa (AUC = 0.50) was insufficient.Conclusions: Overall, the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has acceptable validity in diagnosing the substance use disorder, anxiety disorder and mood disorder among Chinese adult population. However, we should be cautious when using it for bipolar disorders and anorexia nervosa.
引用
收藏
页码:2462 / 2466
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Case ascertainment: the composite international diagnostic interview
    Andrews, G
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 34 : S161 - S163
  • [22] Lessons learned from the clinical reappraisal study of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview with Latinos
    Alegria, Margarita
    Shrout, Patrick E.
    Torres, Maria
    Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto
    Abelson, Jamie M.
    Powell, Meris
    Interian, Alejandro
    Lin, Julia
    Laderman, Mara
    Canino, Glorisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (02) : 84 - 95
  • [23] Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disability: a structured psychiatric interview for intellectual disability
    Gonzalez-Gordon, RG
    Salvador-Carulla, L
    Romero, C
    Gonzalez-Saiz, F
    Romero, D
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2002, 46 : 209 - 217
  • [24] Reliability and Validity of the Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes-Parent Version in Autism Spectrum Disorders
    Witwer, Andrea N.
    Lecavalier, Luc
    Norris, Megan
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2012, 42 (09) : 1949 - 1958
  • [25] Reliability and Validity of the Children’s Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes-Parent Version in Autism Spectrum Disorders
    Andrea N. Witwer
    Luc Lecavalier
    Megan Norris
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012, 42 : 1949 - 1958
  • [26] Modifying and validating the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for use in Nepal
    Ghimire, Dirgha J.
    Chardoul, Stephanie
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Axinn, William G.
    Adhikari, Bishnu P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (01) : 71 - 81
  • [27] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised in Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Huang, Chi-Fen
    Lin, Yu-Siou
    Chiu, Yen-Nan
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
    Lin, Chiao-Fan
    Hsieh, Yi-Hsuan
    Liu, Wen-Sheng
    Chan, Hsiang-Lin
    Wu, Yu-Yu
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2022, 18 : 327 - 339
  • [28] Diagnostic validity Polish language version of the questionnaire MINI-KID (Mini International Neuropsychiatry Interview for Children and Adolescent)
    Adamowska, Sylwia
    Adamowski, Tomasz
    Frydecka, Dorota
    Kiejna, Andrzej
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (07) : 1744 - 1750
  • [29] Design and field procedures for the clinical reappraisal of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.3 in Qatar's national mental health study
    Amro, Iman
    Ali, Amal
    Hassan, Mohamed H. M. O.
    Al Shawwaf, Mahmoud
    Alhassan, Ahmed
    Al Bahari, Dalia
    El Fakki, Hana
    Hijawi, Zaineb
    Aly, Sheeren
    Amin, Asmaa
    Mohammed, Rumaisa
    Nofel, Marwa
    Abdelkader, Menattalh
    Salman, Salma
    Currie, James
    Alabdulla, Majid
    Sampson, Nancy A.
    First, Michael
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Woodruff, Peter W.
    Khaled, Salma M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2023,
  • [30] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R)
    Yang, Yang
    Preti, Emanuele
    Hu, Jia
    Chen, Shuangyi
    Wang, Yuan
    Su, Shanshan
    Jiang, Wenhui
    Zhao, Wenqing
    Tao, Jing
    Clarkin, John F.
    Qiu, Jianyin
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2024, 36 (09) : e27 - e37