Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings

被引:1
|
作者
Lu Jin
Huang Yue-Qin
Liu Zhao-Rui
Cao Xiao-Lan
机构
[1] Beijing 100191
[2] China
[3] Ministry of Health (Peking University)
[4] Peking University Institute of Mental Health
[5] Key Laboratory of Mental Health
[6] Peking University Sixth Hospital
关键词
Composite International Diagnostic Interview; Concordance; Mental Disorder; Reliability; Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Fourth Edition Axis I Disorders; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) is a fully structured lay-administered diagnostic interview for the assessment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the Chinese CIDI in diagnosing mental disorders in psychiatric settings.Methods: We recruited 208 participants, of whom 148 were patients from two psychiatric hospitals and 60 healthy people from communities. These participants were administered with CIDI by six trained lay interviewers and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I, gold standard) by two psychiatrists. Agreement between CIDI and SCID-I was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Individual-level CIDI-SCID diagnostic concordance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and Cohen’s K.Results: Substantial to excellent CIDI to SCID concordance was found for any substance use disorder (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.926), any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.807) and any mood disorder (AUC = 0.806). The concordance between the CIDI and the SCID for psychotic and eating disorders is moderate. However, for individual mental disorders, the CIDI-SCID concordance for bipolar disorders (AUC = 0.55) and anorexia nervosa (AUC = 0.50) was insufficient.Conclusions: Overall, the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has acceptable validity in diagnosing the substance use disorder, anxiety disorder and mood disorder among Chinese adult population. However, we should be cautious when using it for bipolar disorders and anorexia nervosa.
引用
收藏
页码:2462 / 2466
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings
    Lu, Jin
    Huang, Yue-Qin
    Liu, Zhao-Rui
    Cao, Xiao-Lan
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (18) : 2462 - 2466
  • [2] Validity of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) psychosis module in a psychiatric setting
    Cooper, L
    Peters, L
    Andrews, G
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (06) : 361 - 368
  • [3] Clinical reappraisal of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Al-Desouki, Majid
    King, Andrew J.
    Sampson, Nancy A.
    Al-Subaie, Abdullah S.
    Al-Habeeb, Abdulhameed
    Bilal, Lisa
    Shahab, Mona K.
    Aradati, Maggie
    Altwaijri, Yasmin A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (03)
  • [4] Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines-Revised
    Wang, Lanlan
    Yuan, Chenmei
    Qiu, Jianying
    Gunderson, John
    Zhang, Min
    Jiang, Kaida
    Leung, Freedom
    Zhong, Jie
    Xiao, Zeping
    ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 6 (03) : 326 - 333
  • [5] Concordance of the composite international diagnostic interview version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys
    Haro, Josep Maria
    Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, Saena
    Brugha, Traolach S.
    De Girolamo, Giovanni
    Guyer, Margaret E.
    Jin, Robert
    Lepine, Jean Pierre
    Mazzi, Fausto
    Reneses, Blanca
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Sampson, Nancy A.
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (04) : 167 - 180
  • [6] The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)
    Quintana, MI
    Andreoli, SB
    Jorge, MR
    Gastal, FL
    Miranda, CT
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 37 (11) : 1739 - 1745
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) in an urban Indigenous Australian sample
    Basit, Tabinda
    Anderson, Mathew
    Lindstrom, Akiaja
    Santomauro, Damian F.
    Whiteford, Harvey A.
    Ferrari, Alize J.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 57 (02) : 283 - 290
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Chinese mandarin version of PedsQL™ 3.0 transplant module
    Chang, Ying
    Luo, Yanhui
    Zhou, Yuchen
    Wang, Ruixin
    Song, Na
    Zhu, Guanghua
    Wang, Bin
    Qin, Maoquan
    Yang, Jun
    Sun, Yuan
    Li, Chunfu
    Zhou, Xuan
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2016, 14
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the Chinese mandarin version of PedsQL™ 3.0 transplant module
    Ying Chang
    Yanhui Luo
    Yuchen Zhou
    Ruixin Wang
    Na Song
    Guanghua Zhu
    Bin Wang
    Maoquan Qin
    Jun Yang
    Yuan Sun
    Chunfu Li
    Xuan Zhou
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14
  • [10] Reliability and Validity of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version
    Kenji J. Tsuchiya
    Kaori Matsumoto
    Atsuko Yagi
    Naoko Inada
    Miho Kuroda
    Eiko Inokuchi
    Tomonori Koyama
    Yoko Kamio
    Masatsugu Tsujii
    Saeko Sakai
    Ikuko Mohri
    Masako Taniike
    Ryoichiro Iwanaga
    Kei Ogasahara
    Taishi Miyachi
    Shunji Nakajima
    Iori Tani
    Masafumi Ohnishi
    Masahiko Inoue
    Kazuyo Nomura
    Taku Hagiwara
    Tokio Uchiyama
    Hironobu Ichikawa
    Shuji Kobayashi
    Ken Miyamoto
    Kazuhiko Nakamura
    Katsuaki Suzuki
    Norio Mori
    Nori Takei
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2013, 43 : 643 - 662