Practice and Challenge of International Peer Review: A Case Study of Research Evaluation of CAS Centers for Excellence

被引:0
作者
Fang Xu [1 ,2 ]
Xiaoxuan Li [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences
[2] School of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词
Chinese Academy of Sciences; CAS Centers for Excellence; International peer review; Research evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G311 [组织和管理];
学科分类号
1201 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Purpose: The main goal of this paper is to show that international peer review can work in China’s context with satisfactory outcomes. Moreover, this paper also provides a reference for the practice of science and technology management.Design/methodology/approach: This paper starts with a discussion of two critical questions about the significance and design of international peer review. A case study of international peer review of CAS Centers for Excellence is further analyzed. Findings: International peer review may provide a solution to address the problem of quantitative oriented research evaluation in China. The case study of research evaluation of CAS Centers for Excellence shows that it is possible and feasible to conduct an international peer review in China’s context. When applying this approach to other scenarios, there are still many issues to consider including individualized design of international peer review combined with practical demands, and further improvement of theories and methods of international peer review. Research limitation: 1) Only the case of international peer review of CAS Centers for Excellence is analyzed; 2) A relatively small number of respondents were surveyed in the questionnaire. Practical implications: The work presented in this study can be used as a reference for future studies.Originality/value: Currently, there are no similarly detailed studies exploring the significance and methodology of international peer review in China.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 34
页数:13
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Science-evaluation reform on the road in China[J]. Jin-Pei Cheng,Xiao-xuan Li,Fang Xu. National Science Review. 2018(05)
  • [2] 基于循证设计的科学基金绩效国际评估研究
    吴建南
    马亮
    郑永和
    [J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33 (06) : 137 - 145
  • [3] Scientometrics of peer review
    Squazzoni, Flaminio
    Brezis, Elise
    Marusic, Ana
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 113 (01) : 501 - 502
  • [4] How do NIHR peer review panels use bibliometric information to support their decisions?
    Gunashekar, Salil
    Wooding, Steven
    Guthrie, Susan
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 112 (03) : 1813 - 1835
  • [5] Measuring cognitive distance between publication portfolios[J] . Ronald Rousseau,Raf Guns,A.I.M. Jakaria Rahman,Tim C.E. Engels. Journal of Informetrics . 2017