A comparison of the toxicity of landfill leachate exposure at the seed soaking and germination stages on Zea mays L.(maize)

被引:0
|
作者
Guangke Li [1 ]
Junyan Chen [1 ]
Wei Yan [1 ]
Nan Sang [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Environment and Resource,Shanxi University
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Landfill leachate; Maize; Phytotoxicity; Seed soaking; Germination;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X703 [废水的处理与利用]; X171.5 [污染生态学];
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the toxicity of landfill leachate exposure at the early stages of seed soaking and germination on maize,a field experiment was conducted to evaluate the physiological aspects of growth,yield and potential clastogenicity of root-tip cells. The maizes were treated with leachate at levels of 2%,10%,20%,30% or 50%(V/V). First,the change of physiological indexes,including chlorophyll(Chl),Malondialdehyde(MDA)and Reactive oxygen species(ROS)levels,combined with yield all showed that soaking with leachate,but not germination,generated a greater ecological risk on maize. After a soaking treatment of maize with 50% leachate,the Chl,MDA and ROS levels during a vigorous growth period were 47.3%,149.8% and 309.7%,respectively,of the control,whereas the yield decreased to 68.6% of the control. In addition,our results demonstrated that the leachate at lower levels could promote growth. This is mainly embodied in that the yield of maize treated with 10%leachate at the soaking stage increased to 116.0% of the control. Moreover,the cytological analysis experiment also demonstrated that the ecological risk of leachate still exists in both cases. Furthermore,the gray relational analysis showed that the ear row number and tassel branch number were the major factors affecting the yield of maize treated with 50%leachate at the stages of soaking and germination,respectively. In general,these results are helpful in understanding the phytotoxicity of leachate,which provides additional reference data for risk assessment and management of leachate.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 213
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SEED GERMINATION AND EARLY SEEDLING DEVELOPMENT OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) UNDER THE STRESS OF DIFFERENT HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS
    Mot, Andrei
    Madjar, Roxana Maria
    Badulescu, Liliana
    Mihalache, Mircea
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2020, 63 (02): : 29 - 34
  • [42] Comparison of American and European maize (Zea mays L.) protein profiles
    Spalekova, Andrea
    Galova, Zdenka
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 19 (02): : 453 - 465
  • [43] Bioavailability and Toxicity of Arsenic in Maize (Zea mays L.) Grown in Contaminated Soils
    Drlickova, Gabriela
    Vaculik, Marek
    Matejkovic, Peter
    Lux, Alexander
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 91 (02) : 235 - 239
  • [44] A comparison of methods for direct gene transfer into maize (Zea mays L.)
    Southgate, EM
    Davey, MR
    Power, JB
    Westcott, RJ
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 1998, 34 (03) : 218 - 224
  • [45] A comparison of methods for direct gene transfer into maize (Zea mays L.)
    Southgate E.M.
    Davey M.R.
    Power J.B.
    Westcott R.J.
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 1998, 34 (3) : 218 - 224
  • [46] Conservation of the germination capacity of pollen grains in three varieties of maize (Zea mays L.)
    Youmbi, E
    The, C
    Tedjacno, A
    GRANA, 2005, 44 (03) : 152 - 159
  • [47] Safeners for chlorsulfuron on maize (Zea mays L.)
    Stoilkova, Gergana
    Yonova, Petranka
    QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2010, 2 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [48] Dwarf mutants of maize (Zea mays L.)
    Cheng, VC
    Cheng, WY
    Cheng, PC
    Walden, DB
    SCANNING, 2005, 27 (02) : 81 - 82
  • [49] THE MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AND THE MAYAN CULTURE
    Lopez Mazon, Sylvia Lorenia
    Garcia Navarrete, Gilberto
    Ibarra Gutierrez, Brenda Natalia
    BIOTECNIA, 2012, 14 (03): : 3 - 8
  • [50] Bioavailability and Toxicity of Arsenic in Maize (Zea mays L.) Grown in Contaminated Soils
    Gabriela Drličková
    Marek Vaculík
    Peter Matejkovič
    Alexander Lux
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2013, 91 : 235 - 239