Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang,China

被引:1
作者
LIU Xuling1
2. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography
3. School of Geography Science and Tourism
机构
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
nature heritage; tourism; ecological security; nature ecological security; landscape visual security; local culture ecological security; Kanas;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P931.5 [岩溶(喀斯特)地貌学]; F592.7 [地方旅游事业];
学科分类号
020202 ; 0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The nature heritages are the precious legacy of nature with outstanding scientific and aesthetic value. They are quite different from other common ecotourism areas, because of its original and unique system, sensitive and vulnerable landscape, and peripheral cultural features. Therefore, the tourism development in the nature heritage sites should be on the premise of ecological security. The evaluation index system of tourism ecological security in nature heritage sites was constructed in this article by AHP and Delphi methods, including nature ecological security, landscape visual security and local culture ecological security, and the security thresholds of indices were also established. In the indices’ weights of the evaluation model, the nature ecological security ranked the highest, followed by tourist landscape visual security and culture ecological security, which reflected the influence degree of the limited factor to tourism ecological security. Then, this paper carried out an empirical study of Kanas of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, which has the potential to be the World Nature Heritage. On the basis of the data attained from survey and observation on the spot, as well as questionnaire answered by tourists and local communities, the ecological security status in Kanas was evaluated. The result showed that the status of Kanas tourism ecological security was better, but there had some limiting factors. Lastly, effective measures were put forward to ensure its ecological security.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   南麂列岛旅游生态足迹与生态效用研究 [J].
周年兴 ;
林振山 ;
黄震方 ;
程春旺 .
地理科学, 2008, (04) :571-577
[2]   基于生态足迹分析的旅游地生态安全评价研究——以开封市为例 [J].
曹新向 .
中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, (02) :70-75
[3]  
FUZZY SYNTHETIC EVALUATION ON RESIDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF TOURISM IMPACTS——Case of Jiuzhaigou National Park, Sichuan Province, China[J]. LU Xiao-li1, WU Chun-you1, XIAO Gui-rong2 (1. School of Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, P. R. China;2. Faculty of Geography Environmental Studies, University of Waterloo, Ontario Canada N2L 3G1).Chinese Geographical Science. 2006(01)
[4]   自然保护区生态旅游影响评价:进展与启示 [J].
刘洋 ;
吕一河 ;
陈利顶 ;
陈飞星 .
自然资源学报, 2005, (05) :771-779
[5]   镜泊湖风景名胜区生态安全评价研究 [J].
董雪旺 .
国土与自然资源研究, 2004, (02) :74-76
[6]   国家生态旅游示范区评价指标体系的构建 [J].
程道品 ;
何平 ;
张合平 .
中南林学院学报, 2004, (02) :28-32
[7]   旅游地生态安全评价研究——以五大连池风景名胜区为例 [J].
董雪旺 .
哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 2003, (06) :100-105
[8]   旅游可持续发展评价指标体系及评价方法研究 [J].
王良健 .
旅游学刊, 2001, (01) :67-70
[9]   自然保护区生态旅游与可持续发展——以哈纳斯自然保护区为例 [J].
杨兆萍 ;
张小雷 .
地理科学, 2000, (05) :450-455
[10]   生态旅游景区环境容量研究 [J].
孙玉军 ;
王如松 .
应用生态学报, 2000, (04) :564-566