Comparison of BRICs' service sectors' competitiveness

被引:0
作者
张国强 [1 ]
郑江淮 [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Indurstrial Economics,School of Economics,Nanjing University
关键词
BRIC; service sector; international competitiveness;
D O I
10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2010.05.005
中图分类号
F719 [服务业];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper presents an empirical comparison of the service sectors in China, Brazil, Russia and India from theperspectives of overall level, internal structure and international competitiveness.The results show that comparedwith India, Brazil and Russia, China’s service sector constitutes a smaller proportion of the national economy andthere is a relatively low proportion of modern services in its service sector.The latter is more likely to affect China’sindustrial upgrade.In addition, it’s an undisputed fact that China’s service exports have weaker overall internationalcompetitiveness than India’s and are mainly low technology-intensive products.China’s industrial policy shouldfocus on optimizing its service structure, accelerating the development pace of modern services and enhancing theinternational competitiveness of its service sector.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   中国服务贸易竞争力的国际比较 [J].
车文立 .
财经问题研究, 2009, (07) :56-63
[2]   中印发展潜力的比较分析 [J].
张勇 ;
王玺 ;
古明明 .
经济研究, 2009, 44 (05) :21-30
[4]   “金砖四国”生产性服务业的水平、结构与影响——基于投入产出法的国际比较研究 [J].
李江帆 ;
朱胜勇 .
上海经济研究, 2008, (09) :3-10
[5]   中国服务业:短处、突破方向与政策着力点——基于中、美、日、德四国投入产出数据的比较分析 [J].
高传胜 ;
李善同 .
中国软科学, 2008, (02) :16-22
[6]   政府规模、法治水平与服务业发展 [J].
汪德华 ;
张再金 ;
白重恩 .
经济研究, 2007, (06) :51-64+118
[7]   中国与印度服务业发展比较 [J].
魏作磊 .
统计研究, 2007, (03) :92-96
[8]   我国服务业发展水平偏低吗? [J].
魏作磊 ;
胡霞 .
经济学家, 2005, (01) :37-43
[9]  
发展的型式[M]. 经济科学出版社 , (美)钱纳里(Chenery, 1988
[10]  
各国的经济增长[M]. 商务印书馆 , (美)库兹涅茨(Kuznets, 1985