Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame structures using GFRP-tube-confined-concrete composite braces

被引:0
|
作者
Nasim S.Moghaddasi B [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Maryland
关键词
brace; composite; confined concrete; glass-fiber-reinforced polymer; frame; nonlinear analysis; retrofit; seismic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU375.4 [框架]; TU352.11 [];
学科分类号
081304 ; 081402 ; 081405 ;
摘要
This paper presents a new type of structural bracing intended for seismic retrofitting use in framed structures. This special composite brace,termed glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer(GFRP)-tube-confined-concrete composite brace,is comprised of concrete confined by a GFRP tube and an inner steel core for energy dissipation.Together with a contribution from the GFRP-tube confined concrete,the composite brace shows a substantially increased stiffness to control story drift, which is often a preferred feature in seismic retrofitting.An analysis model is established and implemented in a general finite element analysis program-OpenSees,for simulating the load-displacement behavior of the composite brace.Using this model,a parametric study of the hysteretic behavior(energy dissipation,stiffness,ductility and strength)of the composite brace was conducted under static cyclic loading and it was found that the area ratio of steel core to concrete has the greatest influence among all the parameters considered.To demonstrate the application of the composite brace in seismic retrofitting, a three-story nonductile reinforced concrete(RC)frame structure was retrofitted with the composite braces.Pushover analysis and nonlinear time-history analyses of the retrofitted RC frame structure was performed by employing a suite of 20 strong ground motion earthquake records.The analysis results show that the composite braces can effectively reduce the peak seismic responses of the RC frame structure without significantly increasing the base shear demand.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 105
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Compressive strength of reinforced concrete column confined by composite material
    Lin, HJ
    Liao, CI
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2004, 65 (02) : 239 - 250
  • [32] Axial compressive performance and design model of fiber wound GFRP tube confined concrete
    Ye, Hanhui
    Xu, Shengliang
    Mao, Ming
    Bu, Zhanyu
    Fuhe Cailiao Xuebao/Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41 (08): : 4246 - 4258
  • [33] Alternative retrofitting strategies to prevent the failure of an under-designed reinforced concrete frame
    Valente, Marco
    Milani, Gabriele
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2018, 89 : 271 - 285
  • [34] Response of reinforced concrete frame structures under blast loading
    Ibrahim, Yasser E.
    Ismail, Mostafa A.
    Nabil, Marwa
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURES FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, 2017, 171 : 890 - 898
  • [35] Self-centering seismic retrofit scheme for reinforced concrete frame structures:SDOF system study
    Yunfeng Zhang and Xiaobin Hu Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
    EarthquakeEngineeringandEngineeringVibration, 2010, 9 (02) : 271 - 283
  • [36] Self-centering seismic retrofit scheme for reinforced concrete frame structures: SDOF system study
    Yunfeng Zhang
    Xiaobin Hu
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2010, 9 : 271 - 283
  • [37] ISCS method for the performance-based seismic design of vertically irregular reinforced concrete frame structures
    Men, Jinjie
    Shi, Qingxuan
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2013, 22 (11) : 887 - 902
  • [38] Seismic Enhancement Techniques for Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings: A Contemporary Review
    Li, Jiaxin
    Fomin, Nikita Igorevich
    Xiao, Shuoting
    Yang, Kaixuan
    Zhao, Shuaiwei
    Yang, Hao
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (06)
  • [39] Seismic Behavior of Steel Reinforced Concrete Frame with Reduced Beam Sections
    Liu Hongru
    Liu Hongquan
    CIVIL ENGINEERING IN CHINA - CURRENT PRACTICE AND RESEARCH REPORT, 2010, : 1158 - +