Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and NitricOxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems

被引：0
|
作者：
郑循华
王明星
王跃思
沈壬兴
李晶
J.Heyer
M.Koegge
H.Papen
金继生
李老土
机构：
来源：
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences | 2000年 / 01期
关键词：
Mitigation options; Emission; Greenhouse gases; Ecosystems;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
S13 [农业化学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
An experimental study on mitigation of greenhouse gas (CH4, N2O and NO) emission has been conducted in a typical cropping system of Southeast China for 4 years. By simultaneous measurement. the CH4. N2O and NO emission fluxes from rice-wheat rotation fields, effects of fertilization. water management. temperature and soil moisture were investigated. Temperature, fertilization and water status were found to be the key factors to regulate CH4, N2O and NO emissions. Based on the experimental results, some agricultural measures were recommended as technical options to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from rice-wheat rotation ecosystems. These mitigation measures are reducing mineral N input. coupling organic manure with chemical fertilizers, applying fertilizers which release available N slowly during periods with intensive plant activity, and applying dry fermented organic manure and well management of water and fertilizer.
引用
收藏
页码：83 / 92
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    Zheng X.
    Wang M.
    Wang Y.
    Shen R.
    Li J.
    Heyer J.
    Koegge M.
    Papen H.
    Jin J.
    Li L.
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 17 (1) : 83 - 92
  • [2] Mitigation options for methane, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from agricultural ecosystems
    Zheng, XH
    Wang, MX
    Wang, YS
    Shen, RX
    Li, J
    Heyer, J
    Koegge, M
    Papen, H
    Jin, JS
    Li, LT
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2000, 17 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [3] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields in Japan and mitigation options: a review
    Akiyama, Hiroko
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 70 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [4] Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review
    Gerber, P. J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H.
    Oh, J.
    Lee, C.
    Meinen, R.
    Montes, F.
    Ott, T.
    Firkins, J.
    Rotz, A.
    Dell, C.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W. Z.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Oosting, S.
    ANIMAL, 2013, 7 : 220 - 234
  • [5] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian dairy farms and mitigation options: An updated review
    Jayasundara, Susantha
    Appuhamy, J. A. D. Ranga Niroshan
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Wagner-Riddle, Claudia
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 96 (03) : 306 - 331
  • [6] Mitigation of postharvest nitrous oxide emissions from soybean ecosystems: a review
    Uchida, Yoshitaka
    Akiyama, Hiroko
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2013, 59 (04) : 477 - 487
  • [7] Nitrous oxide emissions from cattle production systems and mitigation options
    Amon, B
    Amon, T
    Alt, C
    Moitzi, G
    Boxberger, J
    PHYTON-ANNALES REI BOTANICAE, 2001, 41 (03) : 17 - 28
  • [8] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Firkins, J. L.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W.
    Lee, C.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5045 - 5069
  • [9] Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry
    Delhotal, K. Casey
    de la Chesnaye, Francisco C.
    Gardiner, Ann
    Bates, Judith
    Sankovski, Alexei
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2006, : 45 - 62
  • [10] Indian methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation flexibility
    Garg, A
    Shukla, PR
    Kapshe, M
    Menon, D
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (13) : 1965 - 1977
12345