Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin

被引:0
|
作者
Lin Wang [1 ]
Guo-Li Gu [2 ]
Zhong-Wu Li [3 ]
Yi-Fan Peng [1 ]
Jin Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
[2] Department of General Surgery,Air Force General Hospital
[3] Department of Pathology,Department of Gastroenterology,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
关键词
Abdominoperineal excision; Preoperative radiotherapy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether an abdominoperineal excision(APE) is associated with increased local recurrence(LR) and shortened disease-free survival(DFS) in mid-low rectal cancer with a negative circumferential resection margin(CRM).METHODS: 283 consecutive cases of mid-low rectal cancer underwent preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy and surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2003 and August 2009. Patients with positive CRM and intraoperative distant metastasis were precluded according to exclusion criteria. Survival analyses were performed in patients with APE or non-APE procedures.RESULTS: 256 of the 283(90.5%) cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 78(30.5%) and 178(69.5%) cases who received APE and non-APE procedures. Fewer female patients(P = 0.016), lower level of tumor(P = 0.000) and higher body mass index(P = 0.006) were found in the APE group. On univariate analysis, the APE group had a higher LR rate(5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.036) and decreased DFS(73.1% vs 83.4%, P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, APE procedure was also an independent risk factor for LR(HR = 5.960, 1.085-32.728, P = 0.040) and decreased DFS(HR = 2.304, 1.298-4.092, P = 0.004). In stratified analysis for lower rectal cancer, APE procedure was still an independent risk factor for higher LR rate(5.6% vs 0%, P = 0.024) and shortened DFS(91.5% vs 73.6%, P = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Following preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy, APE procedure was still a predictor for LR and decreased DFS even with negative CRM. More intensive preoperative treatment should be planned for the candidates who are scheduled to receive APE with optimal imaging assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:9138 / 9145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Circumferential resection margin positivity after preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced rectal cancer: implication of boost radiotherapy to the involved mesorectal fascia
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Park, Min Jung
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Min, Byung Soh
    Ahn, Joong Bae
    Kim, Tae Il
    Kim, Ho Geun
    Koom, Woong Sub
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (04) : 316 - 322
  • [42] The adequacy of the distal resection margin after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Kim, T. G.
    Park, W.
    Choi, D. H.
    Kim, S. -H.
    Kim, H. C.
    Lee, W. Y.
    Park, J. O.
    Park, Y. S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (08) : O257 - O263
  • [43] Risk of local recurrence of rectal cancer and circumferential resection margin: population-based cohort study
    Agger, E. A.
    Jorgren, F. H.
    Lydrup, M. -L. A.
    Buchwald, P. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (05) : 580 - 585
  • [44] Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision
    Lin, Hung-Hsin
    Lin, Jen-Kou
    Lin, Chun-Chi
    Lan, Yuan-Tzu
    Wang, Huann-Sheng
    Yang, Shung-Haur
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Liang, Wen-Yih
    Chang, Shih-Ching
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [45] A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer
    Krishna, A.
    Rickard, M. J. F. X.
    Keshava, A.
    Dent, O. F.
    Chapuis, P. H.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [46] Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients
    Justiniano, Carla E.
    Aquina, Christopher T.
    Fleming, Fergal J.
    Xu, Zhaomin
    Boscoe, Francis P.
    Schymura, Maria J.
    Temple, Larissa K.
    Becerra, Adan Z.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 218 (05) : 881 - 886
  • [47] The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Patel, A.
    Green, N.
    Sarmah, P.
    Langman, G.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Youssef, H.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [48] Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin After Curative Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Galvez, Ana
    Biondo, Sebastiano
    Trenti, Loris
    Espin, Eloy
    Kraft, Miquel
    Farres, Ramon
    Codina-Cazador, Antonio
    Flor, Blas
    Garcia-Granero, Eduardo
    Enriquez-Navascues, Jose M.
    Borda-Arrizabalaga, Nerea
    Kreisler, Esther
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2023, 66 (07) : 887 - 897
  • [49] Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route
    Scheepers, J. J. G.
    van der Peet, D. L.
    Veenhof, A. A. F. A.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2009, 22 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [50] Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement after long-term preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer
    P. Luna
    A. Maffuz
    S. Rodriguez
    M. Gutierrez de la Barrera
    I. Alvarado
    E. Bustos
    S. Labastida
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : S111 - S111