Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin

被引:0
|
作者
Lin Wang [1 ]
Guo-Li Gu [2 ]
Zhong-Wu Li [3 ]
Yi-Fan Peng [1 ]
Jin Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
[2] Department of General Surgery,Air Force General Hospital
[3] Department of Pathology,Department of Gastroenterology,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
关键词
Abdominoperineal excision; Preoperative radiotherapy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether an abdominoperineal excision(APE) is associated with increased local recurrence(LR) and shortened disease-free survival(DFS) in mid-low rectal cancer with a negative circumferential resection margin(CRM).METHODS: 283 consecutive cases of mid-low rectal cancer underwent preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy and surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2003 and August 2009. Patients with positive CRM and intraoperative distant metastasis were precluded according to exclusion criteria. Survival analyses were performed in patients with APE or non-APE procedures.RESULTS: 256 of the 283(90.5%) cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 78(30.5%) and 178(69.5%) cases who received APE and non-APE procedures. Fewer female patients(P = 0.016), lower level of tumor(P = 0.000) and higher body mass index(P = 0.006) were found in the APE group. On univariate analysis, the APE group had a higher LR rate(5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.036) and decreased DFS(73.1% vs 83.4%, P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, APE procedure was also an independent risk factor for LR(HR = 5.960, 1.085-32.728, P = 0.040) and decreased DFS(HR = 2.304, 1.298-4.092, P = 0.004). In stratified analysis for lower rectal cancer, APE procedure was still an independent risk factor for higher LR rate(5.6% vs 0%, P = 0.024) and shortened DFS(91.5% vs 73.6%, P = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Following preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy, APE procedure was still a predictor for LR and decreased DFS even with negative CRM. More intensive preoperative treatment should be planned for the candidates who are scheduled to receive APE with optimal imaging assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:9138 / 9145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database
    Simon, Hillary L.
    de Paula, Thais Reif
    Profeta da Luz, Magda M.
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    Keller, Deborah S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (09) : 1096 - 1105
  • [22] Circumferential Resection Margin Status as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Preoperative MRI for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy
    Mazaki, Junichi
    Tsukamoto, Shunsuke
    Miyake, Mototaka
    Moritani, Konosuke
    Sakamoto, Ryohei
    Shida, Dai
    Kanemitsu, Yukihide
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [23] Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Dan Asplund
    Mattias Prytz
    David Bock
    Eva Haglind
    Eva Angenete
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 1563 - 1570
  • [24] Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients
    Keskin, Metin
    Bayraktar, Adem
    Sivirikoz, Emre
    Yegen, Gulcin
    Karip, Bora
    Saglam, Esra
    Bulut, Mehmet Turker
    Balik, Emre
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (05)
  • [25] Outcomes of rectal cancer patients with a positive pathological circumferential resection margin
    Swapnil Patel
    Mufaddal Kazi
    Ashwin L. Desouza
    Vivek Sukumar
    Jayesh Gori
    Munita Bal
    Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 1151 - 1159
  • [26] Circumferential Resection Margin as Predictor of Nonclinical Complete Response in Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer
    Chin, Re-, I
    Schiff, Joshua P.
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Pedersen, Katrina S.
    Aranha, Olivia
    Huang, Yi
    Hunt, Steven R.
    Glasgow, Sean C.
    Tan, Benjamin R.
    Wise, Paul E.
    Silviera, Matthew L.
    Smith, Radhika K.
    Suresh, Rama
    Byrnes, Kathleen
    Samson, Pamela P.
    Badiyan, Shahed N.
    Henke, Lauren E.
    Mutch, Matthew G.
    Kim, Hyun
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2023, 66 (07) : 973 - 982
  • [27] Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Asplund, Dan
    Prytz, Mattias
    Bock, David
    Haglind, Eva
    Angenete, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (11) : 1563 - 1570
  • [28] Outcomes of rectal cancer patients with a positive pathological circumferential resection margin
    Patel, Swapnil
    Kazi, Mufaddal
    Desouza, Ashwin L.
    Sukumar, Vivek
    Gori, Jayesh
    Bal, Munita
    Saklani, Avanish
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (03) : 1151 - 1159
  • [29] Evaluation of the quality of life in patients undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision with no preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer
    Ponczek, Danuta
    Nowicki, Andrzej
    Zegarski, Wojciech
    Banaszkiewicz, Zbigniew
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2005, 9 (08): : 359 - 364
  • [30] Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection
    Simpson, G. S.
    Eardley, N.
    McNicol, F.
    Healey, P.
    Hughes, M.
    Rooney, P. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (05) : 585 - 590