Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin

被引:0
|
作者
Lin Wang [1 ]
Guo-Li Gu [2 ]
Zhong-Wu Li [3 ]
Yi-Fan Peng [1 ]
Jin Gu [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
[2] Department of General Surgery,Air Force General Hospital
[3] Department of Pathology,Department of Gastroenterology,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
关键词
Abdominoperineal excision; Preoperative radiotherapy; Circumferential resection margin; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.37 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether an abdominoperineal excision(APE) is associated with increased local recurrence(LR) and shortened disease-free survival(DFS) in mid-low rectal cancer with a negative circumferential resection margin(CRM).METHODS: 283 consecutive cases of mid-low rectal cancer underwent preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy and surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2003 and August 2009. Patients with positive CRM and intraoperative distant metastasis were precluded according to exclusion criteria. Survival analyses were performed in patients with APE or non-APE procedures.RESULTS: 256 of the 283(90.5%) cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 78(30.5%) and 178(69.5%) cases who received APE and non-APE procedures. Fewer female patients(P = 0.016), lower level of tumor(P = 0.000) and higher body mass index(P = 0.006) were found in the APE group. On univariate analysis, the APE group had a higher LR rate(5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.036) and decreased DFS(73.1% vs 83.4%, P = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, APE procedure was also an independent risk factor for LR(HR = 5.960, 1.085-32.728, P = 0.040) and decreased DFS(HR = 2.304, 1.298-4.092, P = 0.004). In stratified analysis for lower rectal cancer, APE procedure was still an independent risk factor for higher LR rate(5.6% vs 0%, P = 0.024) and shortened DFS(91.5% vs 73.6%, P = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Following preoperative 30 Gy/10 F radiotherapy, APE procedure was still a predictor for LR and decreased DFS even with negative CRM. More intensive preoperative treatment should be planned for the candidates who are scheduled to receive APE with optimal imaging assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:9138 / 9145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin
    Wang, Lin
    Gu, Guo-Li
    Li, Zhong-Wu
    Peng, Yi-Fan
    Gu, Jin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (27) : 9138 - 9145
  • [2] Differences in Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement After Abdominoperineal Excision and Low Anterior Resection No Longer Significant
    van Leersum, Nicoline
    Martijnse, Ingrid
    den Dulk, Marcel
    Kolfschoten, Nikki
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    van de Velde, Cornelius
    Tollenaar, Rob
    Wouters, Michel
    Rutten, Harm J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (06) : 1150 - 1155
  • [3] Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Hiranyakas, A.
    da Silva, G.
    Wexner, S. D.
    Ho, Y. -H.
    Allende, D.
    Berho, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [4] Circumferential Resection Margin as a Prognostic Marker in the Modern Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer
    Nikberg, Maziar
    Kindler, Csaba
    Chabok, Abbas
    Letocha, Henry
    Shetye, Jayant
    Smedh, Kenneth
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [5] Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Sains, Parvinder S.
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [6] Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma?
    HosseinaliKhani, M.
    Smedh, K.
    Kraaz, W.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (08) : 706 - 712
  • [7] A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Baird, Daniel L. H.
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Pawa, Nikhil
    Brown, Gina
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) : 291 - 299
  • [8] Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery
    Kelly, S. B.
    Mills, S. J.
    Bradburn, D. M.
    Ratcliffe, A. A.
    Borowski, D. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 573 - 581
  • [9] Prognostic Significance of Circumferential Resection Margin Following Total Mesorectal Excision and Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Seung Hyuk Baik
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Young Chan Lee
    Hoguen Kim
    Kang Young Lee
    Seung Kook Sohn
    Chang Hwan Cho
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14 : 462 - 469
  • [10] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Lee, Young Chan
    Kim, Hoguen
    Lee, Kang Young
    Sohn, Seung Kook
    Cho, Chang Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 462 - 469