Measuring episodic abdominal pain and disability in suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

被引:0
作者
Valerie Durkalski [1 ]
Walter Stewart [2 ]
Paulette MacDougall [3 ]
Patrick Mauldin [4 ]
Joseph Romagnuolo [3 ]
Olga Brawman-Minzter [5 ]
Peter Cotton [3 ]
机构
[1] Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,Medical University of South Carolina
[2] Center for Health Research,Geisinger Health System  3. Digestive Diseases Center,Medical University of South Carolina  4. Department of Pharmacy
关键词
Sphincter of Oddi; Abdominal pain; Disability measurement; Reproducibility of results; Pain measurement; Episodic pain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.4 [胆囊、胆管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
AIM:To evaluate the reliability of an instrument that measures disability arising from episodic abdominal pain in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction(SOD).METHODS:Although several treatments have been utilized to reduce pain and associated disability,measurement tools have not been developed to reliably track outcomes.Two pilot studies were conducted to assess test-retest reliability of a newly developed instrument,the recurrent abdominal pain intensity and disability(RAPID) instrument.The RAPID score is a 90-d summation of days where productivity for various daily activities is reduced as a result of abdominal pain episodes,and is modeled after the migraine disability assessment instrument used to measure headache-related disability.RAPID was administered by telephone on 2 consecutive occasions in 2 consenting populations with suspected SOD:a pre-sphincterotomy population(Pilot Ⅰ,n = 55) and a post-sphincterotomy population(Pilot Ⅱ,n = 70).RESULTS:The average RAPID scores for Pilots Ⅰ and Ⅱ were:82 d(median:81.5 d,SD:64 d) and 48 d(median:0 d,SD:91 d),respectively.The concordance between the 2 assessments for both populations was very good:0.81 for the pre-sphincterotomy population and 0.95 for the post-sphincterotomy population.CONCLUSION:The described pilot studies suggest that RAPID is a reliable instrument for measuring disability resulting from abdominal pain in suspected SOD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:4416 / 4421
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Functional gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders [J].
Behar, Jose ;
Corazziari, Enrico ;
Guelrud, Moises ;
Hogan, Walter ;
Sherman, Stuart ;
Toouli, James .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (05) :1498-1509
[2]   Improved predictors of outcome in postcholecystectomy pain [J].
Topazian, M ;
Hong-Curtis, JA ;
Li, JY ;
Wells, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 38 (08) :692-696
[3]  
Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review[J] . Martin L Freeman,Nalini M Guda.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2004 (7)
[4]  
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, part 2: evidence-based review of the presentations, with “objective” pancreatic findings (types I and II) and of presumptive type III[J] . Bret T Petersen.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2004 (6)
[5]  
Key issues in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction[J] . Shyam Varadarajulu,Robert Hawes.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North Americ . 2003 (4)
[6]   Long-term outcome of endoscopic-dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy in patients with manometry-documented sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and normal pancreatogram [J].
Park, SH ;
Watkins, JL ;
Fogel, EL ;
Sherman, S ;
Lazzell, L ;
Bucksot, L ;
Lehman, GA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (04) :483-491
[7]  
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002[J] . Sidney Cohen,Bruce R. Bacon,Jesse A. Berlin,David Fleischer,Gail A. Hecht,Patrick J. Loehrer,Alfred E. McNair,Michael Mulholland,Nancy J. Norton,Linda Rabeneck,David F. Ransohoff,Amnon Sonnenberg,Michael W. Vannier.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2002 (6)
[8]   DDQ-15 health-related quality of life instrument for patients with digestive disorders [J].
Hebert R.L. ;
Palesch Y.Y. ;
Mauldin P.D. ;
Tarnasky P.R. ;
Aabakken L. ;
Hennessey W. ;
Cotton P.B. .
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2001, 2 (2) :137-156
[9]  
Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability[J] . Walter F. Stewart,Richard B. Lipton,Andrew J. Dowson,James Sawyer.Neurology . 2001 (6 Su)
[10]   Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers [J].
Stewart, WF ;
Lipton, RB ;
Kolodner, KB ;
Sawyer, J ;
Lee, C ;
Liberman, JN .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (01) :41-52