Enhancing mortar strengths by ternary geopolymer binder of metakaolin, slag, and palm ash

被引:15
作者
Aboshia A.M.A. [1 ]
Rahmat R.A. [1 ]
Zain M.F.M. [1 ]
Ismail A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi
关键词
Alkaline mixture; Metakaolin; Mortar strength; Palm oil fuel ash; Slag; Ternary geopolymer binder;
D O I
10.1108/IJBPA-03-2017-0014
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop an alternative new ternary geopolymer mortar (MKSP) to resolve a traditional mortar problem which exhibits several disadvantages, including poor strengths and surface microcracks and the CO2 air pollution. Design/methodology/approach: The MKSP ternary binder was produced using metakaolin (MK), slag (S), and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) activated with an alkaline mixture of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) and 10 M NaOH in a mass ratio of 2.5. Seven different mix proportions of MK, slag, and POFA were used to fabricate MKSP mortars. The water-to-binder ratio was varied between 0.4 and 0.5. The mortars were heat cured for 2 h at 80°C and then aged in air. Flexural stress and strain, mortars flow and compressive strength were tested. Furthermore, the mortars were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. Findings: The results showed that the sample MKSP6, which contained 40 percent MK, 40 percent slag, and 20 percent POFA, exhibited high compressive strength (52 MPa) without any cracks and flexural strength (6.9 MPa) at 28 days after being cured for 2 h at 80°C; however, the MKSP7 mortar with optimal strength of 55 MPa showed some surface cracks. Further, the results of the XRD, SEM, and FTIR analyses indicated that the MKSP mortars primarily consisted of a crystalline (Si+Al) phase (70 percent) and a smaller amorphous (Si+Ca) phase (30 percent). Research limitations/implications: The MKSP ternary geopolymer mix has three limitations as an importance of heat curing for development early strength, POFA content less than 20 percent to gain high normal strength and delaying the sitting time by controlling the slag content or the alkali activator type. Practical implications: The use of geopolymer materials binder in a real building is limited and it still under research, Thus, the first model of real applied geopolymer cement in 2008 was the E-Crete model that formed by Zeobond company Australia to take the technology of geopolymer concrete to reality. Zeobond Pty Ltd was founded by Professor Jannie S.J. van (van Deventer et al., 2013), it was used to product precast concrete for the building structure. The second model was PYRAMENT model in 2002 by American cement manufacturer Lone Star Industries which was produced from the development carried out on inorganic alumino-silicate polymers called geopolymer (Palomo et al., 1999). In 2013 the third model was Queensland’s University GCI building with three suspended floors made from structural geopolymer concrete containing slag/fly ash-based geopolymer (Pathak, 2016). In Australia, 2014, the newly completed Brisbane West Wellcamp airport becomes the greenest airport in the world. Cement-free geopolymer concrete was used to save more than 6,600 tons of carbon emissions in the construction of the airport. Therefore, the next century will see cement companies developing alternative binders that are more environmentally friendly from a sustainable development point of view. Originality/value: Production of new geopolymer binder of mortar as alternative to traditional cement binder with high early and normal strength from low cost waste materials, less potential of cracking, less energy consumption need and low carbon dioxide emission. © 2017, © Emerald Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 455
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Adam A.A., Strength and Durability Properties of Alkali Activated Slag and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, (2009)
[2]  
Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, (2001)
[3]  
Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar, (2009)
[4]  
Bondar D., Lynsdale C.J., Milestone N.B., Hassani N., Ramezanianpour A.A., Effect of type, form, and dosage of activators on strength of alkali-activated natural pozzolans, Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 2, pp. 251-260, (2011)
[5]  
Borges P.H., Banthia N., Alcamand H.A., Vasconcelos W.L., Nunes E.H., Performance of blended metakaolin/blastfurnace slag alkali-activated mortars, Cement and Concrete Composites, 71, pp. 42-52, (2016)
[6]  
Brouwers H., Radix H., Self-compacting concrete: theoretical and experimental study, Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 11, pp. 2116-2136, (2005)
[7]  
Burciaga O., Gomez Z.L., Escalante G.J., Influence of the long term curing temperature on the hydration of alkaline binders of blast furnace slag-metakaolin, Construction and Building Materials, 113, 15, pp. 917-926, (2016)
[8]  
Chana P., Low carbon cements: the challenges and opportunities, pp. 8-9, (2011)
[9]  
Davidovits J., Properties of geopolymer cements, pp. 131-149, (1994)
[10]  
Hawa A., Tonnayopas D., Prachasaree W., Taneerananon P., Development and performance evaluation of very high early strength geopolymer for Rapid road repair, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, pp. 1-9, (2013)