Accurate Cycle Predictions and Calibration Optimization Using a Two-Stage Global Dynamic Model

被引:1
作者
Mohd Azmin F. [1 ]
Mortimer P. [1 ]
Seabrook J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ricardo UK Ltd, United Kingdom
关键词
Digital storage - Oxidation - Stochastic systems - Soot - Engines - Random processes - Calibration - Design of experiments - Forecasting;
D O I
10.4271/2017-01-0583
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the introduction in Europe of drive cycles such as RDE and WLTC, transient emissions prediction is more challenging than before for passenger car applications. Transient predictions are used in the calibration optimization process to determine the cumulative cycle emissions for the purpose of meeting objectives and constraints. Predicting emissions such as soot accurately is the most difficult area, because soot emissions rise very steeply during certain transients. The method described in this paper is an evolution of prediction using a steady state global model. A dynamic model can provide the instantaneous prediction of boost and EGR that a static model cannot. Meanwhile, a static model is more accurate for steady state engine emissions. Combining these two model types allows more accurate prediction of emissions against time. A global dynamic model combines a dynamic model of the engine air path with a static DoE (Design of Experiment) emission model. The dynamic model is constructed using a Volterra series model for the EGR response and a Stochastic Process Model (SPM) for boost pressure. Both models are trained using data collected from APRBS (Amplitude Modulated Pseudo Random Binary Sequences) type tests. The static model is an SPM trained using data collected in a steady state DoE test. The output of the global dynamic model is an accurate prediction of engine emissions with a drive cycle and calibration as model inputs. The global dynamic model is called during the calibration optimization process and the cycle cumulative results are used to control the constraints and optimize the objectives. This produces final calibration maps ready for immediate vehicle tests without test bed validation, thereby improving the efficiency of the calibration process. © 2017 SAE International.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 290
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Mohd Azmin F., Stobart R., Benefiting from Sobol Sequences Experiment Design Type for Model-based Calibration, SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1640, (2015)
[2]  
Kouba A., Navratil J., Hnilicka B., Niven P., Sensorless Control Strategy Enabled by a Sophisticated Tool Chain, SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2847, (2015)
[3]  
Ezzeddinne M., Castro E., Lengelle R., Dynamic Design of Experiments for Engine Pollutants Emissions Modeling and Optimization, SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2454, (2008)
[4]  
Hafner M., Model Based Determination of Dynamic Engine Control Function Parameters, SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1981, (2001)
[5]  
Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., Wynn H.P., Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Statistical Science, 4, 4, pp. 409-435, (1989)
[6]  
Deng Q., Burke R., Turbocharger Dynamic Performance Prediction by Volterra Series Model, SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2558, (2014)
[7]  
Gutjahr T., Kleinegraber H., Ulmer H., Kruse T., Eckstein C., New Approaches for Modeling Dynamic Engine Behavior with Gaussian Processes, (2013)
[8]  
Dickinson P., Shenton A., Rapid Transient Fuelling Calibration Method for the PFI SI Engine, SAE Int. J. Engines, 2, 1, pp. 327-334, (2009)
[9]  
Mohd Azmin F., Stobart R., Rutledge J., Winward E., Using a Statistical Machine Learning Tool for Diesel Engine Air Path Calibration, SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2391, (2014)
[10]  
Seabrook J., Day R., Newman P., Jarvis S., Co-Optimisation of Engine and SCR System in an Advanced Diesel Vehicle