Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

被引:5
作者
Angriman, Federico [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Momenzade, Neda [4 ]
Adhikari, Neill K. J. [1 ,2 ]
Mouncey, Paul R. [5 ]
Asfar, Pierre [6 ]
Yarnell, Christopher J. [2 ,7 ]
Ong, Sean Wei Xiang [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Pinto, Ruxandra [2 ]
Doidge, James C. [11 ,12 ]
Shankar-Hari, Manu [13 ,14 ]
Harhay, Michael O. [15 ,16 ,17 ]
Masse, Marie-Helene [18 ]
Harrison, David A. [5 ]
Rowan, Kathryn M. [5 ]
Li, Fan [19 ]
Carter, Francis [20 ]
Camirand-Lemyre, Felix [4 ]
Lamontagne, Francois [18 ,21 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Math, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Intens Care Natl Audit & Res Ctr, Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[6] CHU Angers, Serv Med Intens Reanimat, Angers, France
[7] Scarborough Hlth Network, Dept Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Natl Ctr Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
[10] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Intens Care Natl Audit & Res Ctr, London, England
[12] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
[13] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Regenerat & Repair, Ctr Inflammat Res, Edinburgh, Scotland
[14] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Intens Care Med, Edinburgh, Scotland
[15] Univ Penn, Palliat & Adv Illness Res PAIR Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[16] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA USA
[17] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[18] Ctr Hosp Univ Sherbrooke, Ctr Rech, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[19] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
[20] Univ Sherbrooke, Med & Hlth Sci Fac, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[21] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Med, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
来源
NEJM EVIDENCE | 2025年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
CRITICALLY-ILL; HYPOTENSION; TRIALS; CARE;
D O I
10.1056/EVIDoa2400359
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe sought to estimate whether a lower mean arterial blood pressure target, compared with a higher mean arterial blood pressure target, reduced 90-day all-cause mortality among critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock.MethodsWe conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of distinct thresholds of mean arterial blood pressure to guide vasopressor support among critically ill adults identified in a systematic literature search. The main exposure was a lower mean arterial pressure target compared with a higher mean arterial pressure target (including usual care). The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. We used a Bayesian random effects log-binomial model to estimate risk ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).ResultsBetween 2010 and 2019, 3352 patients were randomly assigned in three trials (SEPSISPAM, OVATION pilot trial, and 65-Trial) across 103 hospitals from the United Kingdom, France, and Canada. When compared with a higher mean arterial blood pressure target or usual care, the risk ratio for 90-day all-cause mortality associated with a lower blood pressure target was 0.93 (95% CrI, 0.76 to 1.07; low certainty, posterior probability of benefit 87%). Results were consistent across multiple secondary and sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for prognostically important baseline covariates and alternative modeling techniques. Multiple approaches to evaluate the heterogeneity of treatment effect did not identify any subgroups that may potentially benefit from higher mean arterial blood pressure targets.ConclusionsTargeting a lower mean arterial blood pressure for vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock possibly reduced 90-day all-cause mortality. However, the certainty of evidence is low, and this analysis does not exclude the possibility that lower targets may cause harm overall. Vasopressors are widely used among critically ill adults. However, there is a lack of clarity on the appropriate blood pressure target. An individual patient data meta-analysis compared higher versus lower mean arterial blood pressure targets for patients with vasodilatory shock.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Patients with Septic Shock [J].
Asfar, Pierre ;
Meziani, Ferhat ;
Hamel, Jean-Francois ;
Grelon, Fabien ;
Megarbane, Bruno ;
Anguel, Nadia ;
Mira, Jean-Paul ;
Dequin, Pierre-Francois ;
Gergaud, Soizic ;
Weiss, Nicolas ;
Legay, Francois ;
Le Tulzo, Yves ;
Conrad, Marie ;
Robert, Rene ;
Gonzalez, Frederic ;
Guitton, Christophe ;
Tamion, Fabienne ;
Tonnelier, Jean-Marie ;
Guezennec, Pierre ;
Van der Linden, Thierry ;
Vieillard-Baron, Antoine ;
Mariotte, Eric ;
Pradel, Gael ;
Lesieur, Olivier ;
Ricard, Jean-Damien ;
Herve, Fabien ;
du Cheyron, Damien ;
Guerin, Claude ;
Mercat, Alain ;
Teboul, Jean-Louis ;
Radermacher, Peter .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (17) :1583-1593
[2]   Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (25) :3083-3107
[3]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[4]   Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ [J].
Burke, Danielle L. ;
Ensor, Joie ;
Riley, Richard D. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (05) :855-875
[5]   Protecting the public from the adverse effects of confused research ethics [J].
Chalmers, Iain ;
Glasziou, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2021, 114 (11) :507-512
[6]   Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study [J].
Chen, Jen-Ting ;
Roberts, Russel ;
Fazzari, Melissa J. ;
Kashani, Kianoush ;
Qadir, Nida ;
Cairns, Charles B. ;
Mathews, Kusum ;
Park, Pauline ;
Khan, Akram ;
Gilmore, James F. ;
Brown, Anne Rain T. ;
Tsuei, Betty ;
Handzel, Michele ;
Lee Chang, Alfredo ;
Duggal, Abhijit ;
Lanspa, Michael ;
Herbert, James Taylor ;
Martinez, Anthony ;
Tonna, Joseph ;
Ammar, Mahmoud A. ;
Hammond, Drayton ;
Nazer, Lama H. ;
Heavner, Mojdeh ;
Pender, Erin ;
Chambers, Lauren ;
Kenes, Michael T. ;
Kaufman, David ;
Downey, April ;
Brown, Brent ;
Chaykosky, Darlene ;
Wolff, Armand ;
Smith, Michael ;
Nault, Katie ;
Sevransky, Jonathan ;
Gong, Michelle N. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (10) :1436-1444
[7]   Low Versus High Blood Pressure Targets in Critically Ill and Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
D'Amico, Filippo ;
Pruna, Alessandro ;
Putowski, Zbigniew ;
Dormio, Sara ;
Ajello, Silvia ;
Scandroglio, Anna Mara ;
Lee, Todd C. ;
Zangrillo, Alberto ;
Landoni, Giovanni .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (09) :1427-1438
[8]   The Intention-to-Treat Principle How to Assess the True Effect of Choosing a Medical Treatment [J].
Detry, Michelle A. ;
Lewis, Roger J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (01) :85-86
[9]  
Dianti J, 2023, NEJM EVID, V2, DOI 10.1056/EVIDoa2200295
[10]  
Evans L, 2024, Analytical Plan