Decision making under conflicting environment: A new MCDM method

被引：29

作者：

Das, Manik Chandra ^{[1
]}

Sarkar, Bijan ^{[2
]}

Ray, Siddhartha ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Automobile Engineering Department, MCKV Institute of Engineering

[2] Production Engineering Department, Jadavpur University

[3] Mechanical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technical Teachers' Training and Research

来源：

International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences | 2012年 / 5卷 / 02期

关键词：

MCDM; MOORA; MOOSRA; Multi-objective optimisation on the basis of simple ratio analysis; Multiple criteria decision making; Ranking;

D O I：

10.1504/IJADS.2012.046505

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Ranking and selection of an alternative amongst many, based on a set of conflicting criteria/attributes are important in multi-criteria decision making problems. Lot of decision making tools with diverse features have been developed in last thirty years. This paper proposes a new method for multi-objective optimisation with discrete alternatives: multi-objective optimisation on the basis of simple ratio analysis (MOOSRA). Like MOORA, the computational procedure of this tool is simple. To understand the applicability of this method a set of published decision making problems have been considered. The results obtained using MOOSRA method have been compared with those obtained by other methods, particularly MOORA method. The distinctive features of the method compare to MOORA, have been highlighted. Copyright © 2012 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

引用

页码：142 / 162

页数：20

共 44 条

[1]

Aouam T., Lamrani H., Aguenaou S., Diabat A., A benchmark based AHP model for credit evaluation, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2, 2, pp. 151-166, (2009)

[2]

Behzadian M., Kazemzadeh R.B., Albadvi A., Aghdasi M., PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 1, pp. 198-215, (2010)

[3]

Bhangale P.P., Agrawal V.P., Saha S.K., Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 39, 12, pp. 1345-1366, (2004)

[4]

Brans J.P., L'ingénièrie de la décision

[5]

elaboration d'instruments d'aideà la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE, L'Aideà la Décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir, pp. 183-213, (1982)

[6]

Brauers W.K.M., Optimization Method for a Stakeholder Society: A Revolution in Economic Thinking by Multiobjective Optimization, (2004)

[7]

Brauers W.K.M., Zavadskas E.K., The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control and Cybernetics, 35, 2, pp. 445-469, (2006)

[8]

Byun H.S., Lee K.S., A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26, 11-12, pp. 1338-1347, (2004)

[9]

Casu B., Thanassoulis E., Evaluating cost efficiency in central administrative services in UK universities, Omega, 34, 5, pp. 417-426, (2006)

[10]

Chakladar N.D., Chakraborty S., A combined TOPSIS-AHP method based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection, Proc. IMechE, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222, 12, pp. 1613-1623, (2008)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →