What you see is not what you get: single-family house renovation and energy retrofit seen through the lens of sociomateriality

被引:20
作者
Buser M. [1 ]
Carlsson V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Construction Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
关键词
Energy renovation; retrofit; single-family house owners; sociomateriality;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2016.1250929
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Representing 30% of the energy consumption in Sweden, the built environment is a clear contender for climate mitigation initiatives. The substantial stock of single-family houses presents ample opportunities to engage in energy-saving refurbishments. However, despite political pressure, only a minority of these refurbishments includes low-energy retrofit. To explain this slow take-off, studies have mostly focused on the necessity to better link new technical solutions with user needs and behaviours. We propose to extend this analysis to a broader set of actors including the craftsmen contracted to carry out the refurbishments and the houses themselves with their specific features and characteristics. To do so, we build our contribution on the concept of sociomateriality. This perspective argues that technological artefacts are socially constructed, but recognizes that materiality also has a role to play. Drawing on the experiences of 24 small craftsman firms, 8 houses as well as their owners, our method comprises interviews, workshops and participant observation complemented by an in-depth case study. The results show many differentiated representations of the renovation process under scrutiny. All these representations need to be understood and to a certain degree aligned in order to achieve successful retrofits. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 287
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Archtnicht M., Madelner R., Factors influencing German house owners’ preferences on energy retrofits, Energy policy, 68, pp. 254-263, (2014)
[2]  
Bartiaux F., Et al., A practice–theory approach to homeowners' energy retrofits in four European areas, Building research and information, 42, 4, pp. 525-538, (2014)
[3]  
Bijker W., Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change, (1995)
[4]  
Bijker W.E., Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change, (1997)
[5]  
Energi i bebyggelsen, tekniska egenskaper och beräkningar: Resultat från projektet BETSI [Energy in buildings, technical characteristics and calculations: Results from the project BETSI], (2010)
[6]  
Förslag till utvecklad nationell strategi för energieffektiviserande renovering Boverket [Proposal to develop national strategy for energy efficient renovation], (2015)
[7]  
Boyd P., Larsen G.D., Schweber L., The co-development of technology and new buildings: incorporating building integrated photovoltaics, Construction management and economics, 33, 5-6, pp. 349-360, (2015)
[8]  
Bresnen M., Harty C., Editorial: objects, knowledge sharing and knowledge transformation in projects, Construction management and economics, 28, 6, pp. 549-555, (2010)
[9]  
Bryman B., Bell E., Business research methods, (2011)
[10]  
Buser M., Carlsson V., Stepping out of the canvas: small construction enterprises experimenting with business models, The 23rd Nordic Academy of Management Conference (NFF), (2015)