Psychometric validation of a reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness test in university students

被引:0
作者
Puente, Anibal [1 ]
Calderon, Juan [2 ]
Gutierrez-de-Blume, Antonio P. [3 ]
Rojas, Luis [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
[3] Georgia Southern Univ, Statesboro, GA USA
[4] Univ San Sebastian, Santiago, Chile
来源
OCNOS-JOURNAL OF READING RESEARCH | 2025年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
Reading comprehension; reading strategies; metacognition; test validity; Higher Education; POOR COMPREHENDERS; SIMPLE VIEW; STRATEGIES; DISCOURSE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.18239/ocnos_2025.24.2.538
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Reading comprehension and self-regulation skills are essential for academic success in higher education. This study presents the development and psychometric analysis of the University Reading and Comprehension Strategies Assessment (URCSA), a test designed to examine reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness in first-year university students. A total of 507 education students from a Chilean university participated. Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses of unidimensionality, difficulty, and item discrimination were evaluated. The results show sufficient evidence of internal validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the instrument to differentiate levels of reading skill. Findings concluded that URCSA is a useful tool for identifying strengths and weaknesses in strategic reading comprehension and metacognition in university settings.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? [J].
Adlof, Suzanne M. ;
Catts, Hugh W. ;
Little, Todd D. .
READING AND WRITING, 2006, 19 (09) :933-958
[2]   Conceptualizing and Assessing Higher-Order Thinking in Reading [J].
Afflerbach, Peter ;
Cho, Byeong-Young ;
Kim, Jong-Yun .
THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2015, 54 (03) :203-212
[3]  
Alderson J.C., 2000, Assessing Reading, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511732935, 10.1017/CBO9780511732935]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PISA 2018 results (volume I): What students know and can do, DOI DOI 10.1787/5F07C754-EN
[5]  
Bachman MK, 2007, J NARRATIVE THEORY, V37, P296
[6]  
Bashiru I., 2012, INT J SCI TOMORROW, V1, P1
[7]   READING SKILL - SOME ADULT COMPARISONS [J].
BELL, LC ;
PERFETTI, CA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 86 (02) :244-255
[8]  
BOND T, 2001, APPL RASCH MODEL FUN
[9]   Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults [J].
Braze, David ;
Tabor, Whitney ;
Shankweiler, Donald P. ;
Mencl, W. Einar .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2007, 40 (03) :226-243
[10]   A Validation of a Reading Comprehension Test for University Students [J].
Brizuela Rodriguez, Armel ;
Perez Rojas, Nelson ;
Rojas Rojas, Guaner .
REVISTA EDUCACION, 2020, 44 (01)