Carbon and energy footprint analysis of tannery wastewater treatment: A Global overview

被引:22
作者
Giaccherini F. [1 ,2 ]
Munz G. [1 ]
Dockhorn T. [3 ]
Lubello C. [1 ]
Rosso D. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Via S. Marta 3, Florence
[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 92697-2175, CA
[3] Institute of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Braunschweig, Pockelsstr. 2a, Braunschweig
[4] Water-Energy Nexus Center, University of California, Irvine, 92697-2175, CA
关键词
Carbon footprint; Energy; Power demand; Tannery wastewater;
D O I
10.1016/j.wri.2017.03.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study the carbon footprint and power demand of tannery wastewater treatment processes for the largest bovine leather producing regions were quantified and analysed. Moreover, we present a case in which we benchmarked the carbon footprint and energy demand analysis of tannery wastewater treatment to municipal wastewater treatment. We quantified the greenhouse gas direct and indirect emissions from tannery wastewater treatment facilities. Our results show that the total CO2-equivalent emission for tannery wastewater treatment is 1.49 103 tCO2,eq d-1. Moreover, the energy intensity of tannery wastewater treatment processes are evaluated at 3.9 kWh kg-1bCOD,removed, compared to 1.4 kWh kg-1bCOD,removed of municipal wastewater treatment processes. Based on this work in the field of tannery wastewater treatment, an effort to innovate suitable treatment trains and technologies has the strong potential to reduce the carbon footprint. © 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Lofrano G., Meric S., Zengin G.E., Orhon D., Chemical and biological treatment technologies for leather tannery chemicals and wastewaters: a review, Sci. Total Environ., pp. 265-281, (2013)
[2]  
Munz G., Gori R., Cammilli L., Lubello C., Characterization of tannery wastewater and biomass in a membrane bioreactor using respirometric analysis, Bioresour. Technol., 99, pp. 8612-8618, (2008)
[3]  
Law Y., Jacobsen G.E., Smith A.M., Yuan Z., Lant P., Fossil organic carbon in wastewater and its fate in treatment plants, Water Res., 47, pp. 5270-5281, (2013)
[4]  
World Statistical Compendium for Raw Hides and Skins, Leather and Leather Footwear 1993-2012, Trade, (2013)
[5]  
Kral I., Clonfero F.S.G., Introduction To Treatment of Tannery Effluents, What Every Tann, Should Know about Effl. Treat, pp. 1-69, (2011)
[6]  
Mannucci A., Munz G., Mori G., Lubello C., Anaerobic treatment of vegetable tannery wastewaters: a review, DES, 264, pp. 1-8, (2010)
[7]  
Gori R., Jiang L.M., Sobhani R., Rosso D., Effects of soluble and particulate substrate on the carbon and energy footprint of wastewater treatment processes, Water Res., 45, pp. 5858-5872, (2011)
[8]  
Monteith H.D., Sahely H.R., MacLean H.L., Bagley D.M., A rational procedure for estimation of greenhouse-gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants, Water Environ. Res., 77, pp. 390-403, (2005)
[9]  
Euro C., The European Chlor-alkali industry: an electricity intensive sector exposed to carbon leakage, Production, pp. 2-6, (2010)
[10]  
Life Cycle Assessment, Carbon Footprint in Leather Processing, 73, (2012)