Efficient surrogate-based aerodynamic design optimization method with adaptive design space expansion

被引:0
作者
Wang C. [1 ]
Gao Z. [1 ]
Zhang W. [1 ]
Xia L. [1 ]
Huang J. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
[2] Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamic Research and Development Center, Mianyang
来源
Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica | 2018年 / 39卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Adaptive design space; Aerodynamic optimization; Efficient global optimization; Hybrid infill method; Kriging model;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.21745
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The infill criterion and design space construction in Kriging-based aerodynamic shape optimization are studied in this paper. A hybrid infill method is proposed, which combines the Expected Improvement (EI) criterion and the Minimum Prediction (MP) criterion using an EI threshold. Global exploration is first implemented by the IE criterion, and local exploitation is then implemented by the MP criterion. Consequently, the convergence rate of Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) is accelerated in a certain design space. To find the global optimum in aerodynamic shape optimization, expansion of the design variable range and multi-round method are employed. Influence of the variable range on the size of design space and density of samples are discussed. To improve the efficiency of samples, an adaptive design space expansion method is proposed. In this method, the design space is dynamic and the range of design variable is expanded in potential dimensions. Accordingly, the samples are allocated efficiently through adaptive expansion of design space boundaries. ADODG airfoil optimization cases show that the adaptive design space expansion method has remarkable superiority over the conventional fixed design space method. © 2018, Press of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Queipo N.V., Haftka R.T., Shyy W., Et al., Surrogate-based analysis and optimization, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41, 1, pp. 1-28, (2005)
[2]  
Forrester A.I.J., Keane A.J., Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 45, 1, pp. 50-79, (2009)
[3]  
Simpson T.W., Mauery T.M., Korte J.J., Et al., Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization, AIAA Journal, 39, 12, pp. 2233-2241, (2001)
[4]  
Wang G.G., Shan S., Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 4, pp. 370-380, (2007)
[5]  
Gutmann H.M., A radial basis function method for global optimization, Journal of Global Optimization, 19, pp. 201-227, (2001)
[6]  
Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., Et al., Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical Science, 4, 4, pp. 409-423, (1989)
[7]  
Gunn S.R., Support vector machines for classification and regression, (1998)
[8]  
Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I., Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, (2006)
[9]  
Jones D.R., Schonlau M., Welch W.J., Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 13, 4, pp. 455-492, (1998)
[10]  
Locatelli M., Bayesian algorithms for one-dimensional global optimization, Journal of Global Optimization, 10, 1, pp. 57-76, (1997)