Measuring public opinion towards artificial intelligence: development and validation of a general AI attitude short scale

被引:0
作者
Novotny, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Wiebke [1 ]
Kern, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Kreuter, Frauke [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
[2] Munich Ctr Machine Learning MCML, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Attitude measurement; Scale development; Survey research; Technology acceptance; AI risk; USER ACCEPTANCE; ITEM; TECHNOLOGY; PACKAGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-025-02478-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked both enthusiasm and ethical concerns in societies. As AI continues to permeate daily life, policymakers need to understand how it is perceived by diverse stakeholders and communities. To reliably measure attitudes towards AI of the general public, a short scale is essential for universal application. Existing scales face limitations in applicability due to their length, sub-standard internal consistency, or a focus on only negative attitudes. In response, we built up on existing scales and developed a unidimensional six-item general AI attitude short scale. First tests on internet panel data from Germany (n = 1001) and the US (n = 3091) obtained favorable results for classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an excellent fit for a single-factor structure, while the scale also exhibited strong criterion-related validity, correlating positively with digital competency and predicting acceptance of several AI applications. Additional IRT analyses suggested high item discrimination, broad coverage of the attitude spectrum and no meaningful differential item functioning (DIF). Thus, we propose a psychometrically sound short scale for measuring general AI attitude and provide insights into the antecedents and consequences of the construct.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[3]  
Ajzen I, 2019, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, VOL 1: BASIC PRINCIPLES, 2ND EDITION, P197
[4]  
Allport G.W., 1935, Handbook of social psychology, P798
[5]  
Andries Van Der Ark L, 2007, R. J Stat Softw, V20, P1, DOI [10.18637/jss.v020.i11, DOI 10.18637/JSS.V020.I11]
[6]  
Asiegbu I.F., 2012, European Journal of Business and Management, V4, P38
[7]  
Baker FB, 2017, STAT SOC BEHAV SC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54205-8
[8]  
Baum SD, 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3070741, 10.2139/ssrn.3070741, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3070741]
[9]   Structural Equation Model Trees [J].
Brandmaier, Andreas M. ;
von Oertzen, Timo ;
McArdle, John J. ;
Lindenberger, Ulman .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 18 (01) :71-86